--- Kevin Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One neocon recently argued that anyone who does not
support Isreael is, by definition, an antisemite,
because Israel is the Jewish national homeland.
Which is ironic in that Arabs are Semitic as well.
Picking sides in the conflict is not anti- or
And free market anarchists like Tucker, who also identified themselves as
libertarian socialists, saw the state as the central, defining
characteristic of capitalist exploitation (and all other forms of
exploitation). Exploitation, defined as the use of force to enable one
person to live off
I don't know what the term neoconservative means
This one is easy. Irving Kristol defined a neo-conservative as a liberal who had been
mugged.
Bill Sjostrom
]
Subject: RE: North on ideology -- Free Markets, Marketeers -- tunneling
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:22:22 +0200
quoth Tom Grey:
. . . For instance, the need for government to prevent tunneling
of newly privatized companies by the managers. . . .
Define please?
It's basically asset stripping
Hummbut I still wonder if North was rights. Maybe we are not sharing
mental models...:-)
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: RE: North on ideology -- Free Markets, Marketeers -- tunneling
Kevin Carson wrote:
I haven't read the Pipes book. He's a neoconservative, isn't he?
I don't know what the term neoconservative means, nor do I understand why
that particular label is relevant to this discussion.
I've read Bethell's book in parts, and skimmed through most of it. It
strikes
Kevin Carson wrote:
As for socialism, its defining characteristic is not necessarily the
absence
of private property rights. Tucker simply defined socialism by two
criteria: the beliefs that 1) all value was created by labor; and 2) that
labor should get 100% of its product. In his view,
In a message dated 8/12/02 8:48:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know what the term neoconservative means, nor do I understand why
that particular label is relevant to this discussion.
I'm not sure that anyone knows what it means or rather, that there's any
common agreement on
In a message dated 8/12/02 8:49:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't read Tucker, but I've always thought that Von Mises is correct
when he says that the essential mark of socialism is that one will alone,
acts, irrespective of whose will it is (Human Action, p 695.) To me, this
