In a message dated 8/12/02 2:42:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< I recall buying a couple of houses in Silicon Valley:
put all your money down, plus whatever you could borrow 
from relatives;add your income to see how much you 
could afford to pay per month
and get an 80% mortgage based on that; with the 
seller accepting a second as the difference from 
your down (often about 10%).

Huge mortgage payment; interest is deductible; 
your "savings" is the steadily increasing equity 
value of the house.

I do NOT know, but am interested, in how this 
"real savings" is included in the savings statistics.

Also, I would guess that middle class wealth effects, 
where most stock is locked in IRA/401k plans, 
are based more on real estate equity wealth than 
on stock market wealth; dispite the much higher
liquidity of the stocks, but again have only my 
gut feelings.  Interest rates dropping
should increase prices (and maybe reduce second
mortgages?), but also encourage refinancing and
borrowing/consuming that equity.

I DO wish (too?) that I could offer more answers,
rather than just questions I'm interested; thanks
to Bill Dickens for his!

Tom Grey >>

I seem to recall during the early 1980s when the US economy looked poor 
compared to (at least some of the) western European economies that national 
savings rates were calculated without regard to homeowners' equity.  Since, 
as I understood it, (western) Europeans were much less likely to own homes 
than are Americans, if you included homeowner's equity at that time American 
savings rates, which looked paltry compared to some of these western European 
savings rates, shot up quite remarkably, becoming comparable or even 
favorable to their western European "competitors."  (I say "competitors" 
rather than competitors because people in the media and politics often view 
them that way, but I suspect that most people on the list would agree that, 
to the degree that it affects out incomes at all, it's better for us to have 
neighbors with higher incomes rather than lower incomes.)

Sincerely,

David Levenstam

Reply via email to