Great news for me ... I'm a Libertarian Paternalist!
I've long what I am, but just not the name.
I ESPECIALLY like the need of humans to direct money flow into
different accounts. I support many gov't individual accounts:
a forced savings retirement account (SMART or whatever)--the second
pillar
So for this libertarian paternalist viewpoint, is the goal of these plans
to force people to do certain things, or make certain behaviors default
in the sense that they are the status quo unless people voluntarily decide
to do otherwise? Otherwise, I don't see how forced saving differs except
