Re: Whither Wittmanian Public Choice?

[Fred Foldvary]

> Why does Donald Wittman's (cfr "The mith of democratic failure") arguments 
> are ipso facto ruled out as "naive panglossian view of the markets" by some 
> scholars?
> Who else is doing political economy work in Wittmanian lines?  Who has 
> elaborated the best rebuttal to Wittman?
> Etch

Charles Rowley and Michelle Vachris reubutted Wittman in their chapter on
"The Virginia school of political economy" in Beyond Neoclassical
Economics, ed. Fred Foldvary  (Edward Elgar Publishing, 1996).