For some reason I didn't get this message until Wednesday, Oct 11, 2000.
I'll take a safe "guess" the James "Heckit" Heckman and Daniel "Don't call
me Janice" McFadden are shoo-ins :-) How can Prof. Baumol continuously be
ignored by this so-called august Committee. Neither Heckman or McFadden
co
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Robin Hanson wrote:
> If the monopolist equals the paper authors, and the product
> over which there is a monopoly has its primary value in producing
> this paper, then I think the journal should require that the
> algorithm be made available free to others, but only for t
Should we resubmit our answers?
Patrick McCann
GMU Undergrad
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Bryan Caplan wrote:
> Followup announcement. I had some technical problems with the
> Personality, Politics, and Economics online test I announced last week.
> Now it is up and working again, but has moved to:
--- Bill Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I alone in my thinking about
> Baumol/Hirschman as the
> most deserving economists without a Nobel Prize on
> their c.v.?
Gordon Tullock?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access
Pat McCann wrote:
>
> Should we resubmit our answers?
>
> Patrick McCann
> GMU Undergrad
For anyone at Mason, and anyone who responded on Thursday, there is no
need.
--
Prof. Bryan Caplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bca
I would add Harold Demsetz to the list of deserving candidates.
Date sent: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:24:17 -0400
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bill Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
I have been away from the list for a while, so excuse
me if Napster has been discussed to death. I was
surprised to find this article by someone knowlegable
on Economics.
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/napster.htm
I was going to send my rebuttal, but perhaps it has
allready been done, and
