Chris Rasch wrote:
My current level of understanding of econometrics and statistics is such that I
don't feel qualified to evaluate the arguments presented in the recent exchange
between Brian and Chris regarding the merits (or lack thereof) of Murry and
Herrnstein's research in The Bell
Chris Auld wrote:
Bryan Caplan wrote:
Most of these wind up being dependent variables at some point in their
book.
I'm not sure why that helps their case at all -- it's as if they've
produced a whole bunch of reduced form equations, treating age,
and, probably inappropriately, SES
