Wasn't it John Kennan who wrote a piece which summarized the original
Card and Krueger results as: the placebo had a big positive effect,
the treatement had no effect, and the sample size is n=2?
Chris Auld (403)220-4098
Economics, University of Calgarymailto
papers with patented
algorithms? Isn't the whole point ostensibly to generate
reproducible results?
2. Would more widescale patenting of such algorithms lead to
increased or decreased aggregate research output?
3. Does anyone know if such a patent is actually enforc
for the
purpose of trying to reproduce the result.
Is that feasible?
Chris Auld (403)220-4098
Economics, University of Calgarymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calgary, Alberta, CanadaURL:http://jerry.ss.ucalgary.ca/
s in solid controlled
experiments or good natural experiments.
Chris Auld (403)220-4098
Economics, University of Calgarymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calgary, Alberta, CanadaURL:http://jerry.ss.ucalgary.ca/
t concerns how race factors into all this,
and I'm not even going to go there.
Individually, none of Herrnstein and Murray's results would pass muster
as an undergraduate term paper in economics, much less a study in a
refereed journal. And if you sum junk, you just get aggregate junk.
telligence matters directly, and if it does, by how much.
Chris Auld (403)220-4098
Economics, University of Calgarymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calgary, Alberta, CanadaURL:http://jerry.ss.ucalgary.ca/
