Am Sat, 8 Oct 2011 15:06:49 +0100 (BST)
schrieb Stuart Winter :
> ARMedslack's installpkg differs from x86's because ARMedslack's is
> patched for several speed improvements on ARM.
Take a look at spkg. It's so much faster than the original package
tools ;)
--
Thorsten Mühlfelder
Salix OS: www.
> All I remember is that when I tried it, I got errors with armeslack's
> installpkg, but I found that the installer has its own version. I've
> compared the two now, and found that there must be some slight difference
> somewhere, the armedslack one is 19K as opposed to the installers' 21K.
The
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Stuart Winter wrote:
>
> > * replace /sbin/pkginstall in armedslack with the one from the x86
> installer
> > (it's just a script, but the armedslack one lacks the -root option)
>
> You mean installpkg ?
> It does have the -root option - this is how the miniroots ar
> * replace /sbin/pkginstall in armedslack with the one from the x86 installer
> (it's just a script, but the armedslack one lacks the -root option)
You mean installpkg ?
It does have the -root option - this is how the miniroots are made, and
the installer's installpkg is copied from the pkgtools
Am Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:40:58 +0100
schrieb Ottavio :
> On 5 October 2011 00:34, Rich wrote:
> > Ah... yes it does if you use the Salix repo, which is a mirror of
> > the ARMedSlack repository with dependency checking. The Salix ARM
> > slapt-get package available already has the repo setup in the
On 5 October 2011 00:34, Rich wrote:
> Ah... yes it does if you use the Salix repo, which is a mirror of the
> ARMedSlack repository with dependency checking. The Salix ARM slapt-get
> package available already has the repo setup in the slapt-getrc config file.
Dependency checking! Horror! Sacril
On 10/04/2011 12:08 PM, lee jones wrote:
Thanks for that :) . But drat! Slapt-get dosen't resolve dependencies!
Ah... yes it does if you use the Salix repo, which is a mirror of the
ARMedSlack repository with dependency checking. The Salix ARM slapt-get
package available already has the repo
sorry, my bad what I was meaning was the script the installer runs, not the
actual files needed to get a boot system running. Mind you I decided to try
- and see - what happens if I pinch the x86 slackware setup/install script
(where you get to choose the packages to install, the keymap, partition,
On 4 October 2011 17:08, lee jones wrote:
>
> Just trying to work out how to do this -- one idea might be to extract the
> install setup from armedslack but I have no idea where it is. I tried
> looking in one of armedslacks' initrd files, but could only find;
A friendly "RTFM":
http://ftp.slackw
Thanks for that :) . But drat! Slapt-get dosen't resolve dependencies!
Here's the thought -- if I can somehow find out what armedslack installs,
then I should somehow be able to install those. Don't really want to try to
guess which packages to install complex stuff (e.g. gcc) as I'll more than
li
On 10/03/2011 04:19 PM, lee jones wrote:
Hello all :)
Was just wondering which packages I'd need to install in armedslack
(still working on the efika mx!) in order to do a complete install of
gcc and all its various bits 'n' pieces?
Would try something like slapt-get, but it dosen't seem to be
On 3 October 2011 21:19, lee jones wrote:
> Hello all :)
>
> Was just wondering which packages I'd need to install in armedslack
> (still working on the efika mx!) in order to do a complete install of
> gcc and all its various bits 'n' pieces?
>
> Would try something like slapt-get, but it dosen't
Hello all :)
Was just wondering which packages I'd need to install in armedslack
(still working on the efika mx!) in order to do a complete install of
gcc and all its various bits 'n' pieces?
Would try something like slapt-get, but it dosen't seem to be
avaliable for armedslack, though it is for
13 matches
Mail list logo