Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-01 Thread Davide
>I've dropped this into /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins: >  http://kotelett.no/ac100/phh/Android2.2/libflashplayer.so >And firefox about:plugins now says: >=== >Shockwave Flash  >   File: libflashplayer.so  >   Version:  >   Shockwave Flash 10.1 r120 >MIME Type      Description    Suffixes >appli

Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-01 Thread Ottavio Caruso
On 1 July 2012 08:42, Davide wrote: > Maybe the version of libflashplayer.so is incompatible with firefox 13 or > maybe there is some other issue with the mesa package on current. Am I missing something? While modern Android OS may share the same kernel with a traditional Linux distro, its runtim

Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-01 Thread Stuart Winter
> available in source code I don't see why people can assume one can > just drop libflashplayer.so for Android and expect it to work and even > if it did you'd open a can of worms. It does work - I tested it. I suspect it doesn't work for Davide because the library is compiled for a CPU higher t

Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-01 Thread stanley garvey
On Jul 1, 2012 13:58 "Stuart Winter" wrote: > > available in source code I don't see why people can assume one can > > just drop libflashplayer.so for Android and expect it to work and > > even > > if it did you'd open a can of worms. > > > > > It is a can of worms. It is closed source and lets