Hello,
I sent an e-mail earlier regarding errors in running the total copy
number vignette, but please disregard that as it turns out it was just
an issue with the annotation files. Sorry for the inconveniences.
However, I've encountered another problem that I'm hoping someone
could help me with.
sadly it appears my CDF is square:
print(cdf)
AffymetrixCdfFile:
Path: annotationData/chipTypes/Ag_SNP_1m520721
Filename: Ag_SNP_1m520721.CDF
Filesize: 243.65MB
Chip type: Ag_SNP_1m520721
RAM: 0.00MB
File format: v4 (binary; XDA)
Dimension: 2560x2560
Number of cells: 6553600
Number of units:
Dear Usergrop.
while proccessing data from the 5000k Sty array (but not the Nsp set),
I receive the folleowing error:
acc - AllelicCrosstalkCalibration(csR, model=CRMAv2)
csC - process(acc)
Error in sort.list(pairsToBuild) :
'x' must be atomic for 'sort.list'
Have you called 'sort' on a
Hi Henrik,
Yes that is correct, sorry again for the inconveniences.
Jack
On Jun 7, 12:12 pm, Henrik Bengtsson h...@stat.berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi Jack,
from your new message '[aroma.affymetrix] Problem with Total Copy
Number Vignette':
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jack Yu
Hi Jack.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jack Yu j.yu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I sent an e-mail earlier regarding errors in running the total copy
number vignette, but please disregard that as it turns out it was just
an issue with the annotation files. Sorry for the inconveniences.
Good.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, seth redmond
seth.redm...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
sadly it appears my CDF is square:
print(cdf)
AffymetrixCdfFile:
Path: annotationData/chipTypes/Ag_SNP_1m520721
Filename: Ag_SNP_1m520721.CDF
Filesize: 243.65MB
Chip type: Ag_SNP_1m520721
RAM: 0.00MB
File
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:41 PM, k o ott4...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Usergrop.
while proccessing data from the 5000k Sty array (but not the Nsp set),
I receive the folleowing error:
acc - AllelicCrosstalkCalibration(csR, model=CRMAv2)
csC - process(acc)
Error in sort.list(pairsToBuild) :
Hi Henrik,
I've ran the entirety of the vignette up to the same point (I did
forget to run the fit(plm, verbose=verbose) and the same error
persists.
The reason I'm using version 1 is because all we need is the raw copy
number so we didn't need any of the additional tools/calculations.