Hi Liu,
That is good to know some one is doing similar stuff as mine.
I was going to through 2-3 papers which described to get a comprehensive
list of CNVs it is better to consider a CNV which is called in 2 or more
CNV calling algorithms. This is what I have observed recently in some
papers
Hi Sam,
I am doing similar stuff with you. I also need to identify regions which
are amplified or deleted. I have paired samples.
There are quite many different ways to define gain and loss of a segment.
It is a tricky question.
>From the literature search, it seems best to call CNVs using fr
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification.
I am working on finding segments of duplication/deletion that are only
present in patients but not in controls. And my samples are non-paired.
>From the literature search, it seems best to call CNVs using from different
softwares to have a comprehensive list
Hi,
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 3:42:59 PM UTC+2, Sam Padmanabhuni wrote:
>
> Dear AromaAffymetrix Team,
>
> First of all, thank you very much for such a detailed vignette on how to
> perform the CNV analysis.
>
> I am Sam, a PhD student in genetics, working on CNV analysis on data from
> Cy
