Re: Potential memory issues with SNP6 analysis (Was: Re: [aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails)

2009-09-07 Thread mbaudis
Henrik, thanks for the comments. > Just so we are one the same page, deleting .Rcache/ directory does not > make R consume more memory, but rather less.   To clarify, deleting of the cached files was not done due to the memory issues per se, but because the processing sometimes was stalling app

Re: Potential memory issues with SNP6 analysis (Was: Re: [aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails)

2009-09-06 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Hi. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:37 PM, mbaudis wrote: > > Dear Henrik, > > FYI, I just ran a complete analysis of 83 SNP6 arrays, based on the > script at > > http://groups.google.com/group/progenetix/web/aroma-affymetrix-processing-visualization > > This time, no memory allocation problems. So if

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-09-03 Thread mbaudis
Dear Henrik, FYI, I just ran a complete analysis of 83 SNP6 arrays, based on the script at http://groups.google.com/group/progenetix/web/aroma-affymetrix-processing-visualization This time, no memory allocation problems. So if this comes up (as it has before): 64 bit (system + R) seems to help

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-09-03 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:17 AM, mbaudis wrote: > >> Did you try my 3rd suggestion? > > Sorry; I had read this as a future option. > > Works like a charm ... Ok, that's good know. FYI for the future, the CRAN repository will always be several days delayed relative to the braju.com repository, whi

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-09-03 Thread mbaudis
> Did you try my 3rd suggestion? Sorry; I had read this as a future option. Works like a charm ... Thanks / Tack! Michael. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ When reporting problems on aroma.affymetrix, make sure 1) to run the latest version of the package, 2) to report the

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-09-03 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Hi. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:30 AM, mbaudis wrote: > > Henrik, > > the 2.9.0 is the latest 64 bit compatible binary. > > Reason for insisting on 64 bit is the large number of memory problems > during probe level/fragment length normalization, which require > frequent process restarts (with R rest

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-09-03 Thread mbaudis
Henrik, the 2.9.0 is the latest 64 bit compatible binary. Reason for insisting on 64 bit is the large number of memory problems during probe level/fragment length normalization, which require frequent process restarts (with R restart after Rcache deletion), sometimes already after ca. 20 x 6.0 a

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-09-03 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:29 AM, mbaudis wrote: > > Dear Henrik, > > I am again having problems (new 64bit R 2.9.0 from > http://r.research.att.com/). Argh, say what you want about OSX, but it does certainly not make repository maintenance easy ;) BTW, R2.9.2 is out now, so 2.9.0 may contain sev

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-09-03 Thread mbaudis
Dear Henrik, I am again having problems (new 64bit R 2.9.0 from http://r.research.att.com/). This time, the version of aroma.core seems to be not in place. Thanks for having a look at it ;-) Michael. > hbLite("aroma.core") Using repository: http://www.braju.com/R/repos Identified packages to b

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-08-18 Thread mbaudis
Henrik, since it is fixed, and on a now running production machine, I don't want to explore too much today. However, I recall that: 1. (definitely) aroma.core was not installed 2. (possibly) R.filesets were not installed, since (I think that) they downloaded & installed after issuing hbLite("R.f

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-08-18 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Thanks Mark, sorry I wasn't clear. The hbLite() command will not install missing CRAN/BioC packages, which is why you would expect an error if you remove required CRAN packages such as digest. Those hbLite() commands were only intended for troubleshooting Michael's setup. Michael, also, after

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-08-18 Thread mbaudis
Dear Henrik and Mark, digest didn't seem to be the problem; I got the same error after installing it through BioC. However, > hbLite("aroma.core"); > library("aroma.core"); did load the package. But running hbInstall("aroma.affymetrix") complained again about missing aroma.core: Tags: Updati

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-08-13 Thread Mark Robinson
Hey Henrik. If I run those commands, they work for me, but only because I already have digest, etc. installed. In order for it to give an error on my R 2.9.1, I've removed a few packages (e.g. digest) from my default install directory (/Users/mrobinson/Library/R/2.9/library/), so that it require

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: installation fails

2009-08-13 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Hi, this seems to be an OSX issue and I cannot reproduce it myself. From the error message: it looks like it there are some parsing errors when parsing version numbers in the PACKAGES file on the repository server, but not sure. See if this is only a problem with the aroma.affymetrix packa