Re: [aroma.affymetrix] Re: CbsModel parameters

2010-10-27 Thread Venkatraman Seshan
This can happen occasionally. The min.width argument specifies the minimum number of probes in the minor arc of the circular (remember this is circular binary segmentation). So if you can get 2 probes from one end and 3 from the other to be significantly different the middle you will get a signif

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: Afffy 6.0 using Nsp I only

2008-10-04 Thread Venkatraman Seshan
Hi Lavinia: Unlike the 500k array, Affy 6.0 (and 5.0) are single chips. Different aliquots of DNA are processed by StyI and NspI separately and mixed together and hybed to a single chip. There are reasons why my collaborator wants to use NspI only. Venkat On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Lavinia

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: Afffy 6.0 using Nsp I only

2008-10-05 Thread Venkatraman Seshan
looking at this kind of data for another > reason - I'm comparing the different generations of Affymetrix chips > and this data could bring some more understanding to the overall > picture. > > Cheers > > Henrik > > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Venkatraman Seshan <

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: UFL annotation

2008-10-05 Thread Venkatraman Seshan
Thank you. I will try the byChipType call. -- Venkat On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Venkat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am trying to extract this info. I have downloaded the necessary > > files but

[aroma.affymetrix] Re: Afffy 6.0 using Nsp I only

2008-10-09 Thread Venkatraman Seshan
Hi Henrik: better from there. One warning though: If you one day decide to > hybridize with both enzymes, I doubt that you can easily mix the CEL > files from NspI-only and NspI+StyI hybs. The reference signals > (theta_R) will probably not be comparible, especially not for the > probes target b