Re: [arr] Re: Question!
Definitely fake... Check this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1MIm2uwsqE http://www.facebook.com/pages/Indian-Movie-BGMS/146146955399503 http://indian-music-bgm.blogspot.com/ Please do not add me in YM. I only use this account for the group... --- On Sat, 8/21/10, Rohit George wrote: From: Rohit George Subject: [arr] Re: Question! To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, August 21, 2010, 11:13 PM Sorry guys I forgot to attach the video link to.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9mIsXGocL4 Sorry once again! On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Rohit George wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > I just had a question about this song. I was just on youtube and stumbled > upon this song. It says it's composed by our A.R.Rahman! Can anyone please > confirm this. > > God Bless A.R.Rahman Sir and all of us his fans! > > Regards, > Rohit G. > >
[arr] Re: Question!
Sorry guys I forgot to attach the video link to.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9mIsXGocL4 Sorry once again! On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Rohit George > wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > I just had a question about this song. I was just on youtube and stumbled > upon this song. It says it's composed by our A.R.Rahman! Can anyone please > confirm this. > > God Bless A.R.Rahman Sir and all of us his fans! > > Regards, > Rohit G. > >
Re: [arr] Re: Question Regarding Parkathey Parkathey
This is what srini replied to my question on Facebook. He probably meant the first full song. This was just a harmony portion and I am pretty sure his voice was also used in Thiruda Thiruda in one of the bgms. *"yes..was the first..was still working those days mostly out of coimbatore."* On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:40 AM, sureshmechnit wrote: > > > Both Srinivas and Anuradha Sriram first sang for A.R.Rahman in > > 'Malarodu Malaringu Maghizhndhaadum Podhu'- The Tamil Choral Version of > Bombay Theme > > He himself told this in when he came as Judge in Vijay TV's Airtel Super > Singer - 2 > > Thanks and Regards, > Sureshkumar. > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > Abhinay Natraj wrote: > > > > Guys, > > > > Do you know if Parkathey Parkathey was the first association between AR > and > > Singer Srinivas? his voice comes at around 1:45-2:00 and again at > 3:20ish. > > Gopal, vithur any thoughts? > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:28 AM, VenkataKrishna wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Try to upload one more precious BGM from the same movie just before the > > > Aathangara marame song. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:50 PM, theepr wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks 'Liku' for a quality share...its great > > >> > > >> (doesn't it looks like the flute interlude in "oda kara maarimuthu" > from > > >> "Indira") > > >> > > >> How about Swarnalatha's humming BGM? (there are two different) > > >> > > >> My humble request to(I'll beg U) rip all the BGMs of this and share > with > > >> us, seems U r owning a very good quality DVD. I have a pyramid one, > Not this > > >> much clarity... > > >> > > >> by the way I wonder why this much late for Express on these BGMS... > > >> I don't forget to listen BGMs of Kizhakku cheemayile and Uhzavan a > single > > >> day. > > >> > > >> --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > >> 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > >> Taimur Nadeem wrote: > > >> > > > >> > wow wow wow wow what a flute piece simply superb . i am amazed so > > >> beautiful so sweet great it is. thanks for posting likant. > > >> > > > >> > regards, > > >> > > > >> > taimur > > >> > > > >> > --- On Sun, 7/18/10, Liku wrote: > > >> > > > >> > From: Liku > > >> > Subject: [arr] Kizhakku Chemayile - BGM with video > > >> > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > >> > 40yahoogroups.com> > > > >> > Date: Sunday, July 18, 2010, 2:22 PM > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Â > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > frndz checkout these videos > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Mindblowing bgmS > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHvGy668KP0 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAFi9pK_NUA (with sir's voice) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > regards > > >> > > > >> > Liku > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
[arr] Re: Question Regarding Parkathey Parkathey
Both Srinivas and Anuradha Sriram first sang for A.R.Rahman in 'Malarodu Malaringu Maghizhndhaadum Podhu'- The Tamil Choral Version of Bombay Theme He himself told this in when he came as Judge in Vijay TV's Airtel Super Singer - 2 Thanks and Regards, Sureshkumar. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Abhinay Natraj wrote: > > Guys, > > Do you know if Parkathey Parkathey was the first association between AR and > Singer Srinivas? his voice comes at around 1:45-2:00 and again at 3:20ish. > Gopal, vithur any thoughts? > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:28 AM, VenkataKrishna wrote: > > > > > > > Try to upload one more precious BGM from the same movie just before the > > Aathangara marame song. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:50 PM, theepr wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Thanks 'Liku' for a quality share...its great > >> > >> (doesn't it looks like the flute interlude in "oda kara maarimuthu" from > >> "Indira") > >> > >> How about Swarnalatha's humming BGM? (there are two different) > >> > >> My humble request to(I'll beg U) rip all the BGMs of this and share with > >> us, seems U r owning a very good quality DVD. I have a pyramid one, Not > >> this > >> much clarity... > >> > >> by the way I wonder why this much late for Express on these BGMS... > >> I don't forget to listen BGMs of Kizhakku cheemayile and Uhzavan a single > >> day. > >> > >> --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > >> Taimur Nadeem wrote: > >> > > >> > wow wow wow wow what a flute piece simply superb . i am amazed so > >> beautiful so sweet great it is. thanks for posting likant. > >> > > >> > regards, > >> > > >> > taimur > >> > > >> > --- On Sun, 7/18/10, Liku wrote: > >> > > >> > From: Liku > >> > Subject: [arr] Kizhakku Chemayile - BGM with video > >> > To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > >> > Date: Sunday, July 18, 2010, 2:22 PM > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Â > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > frndz checkout these videos > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Mindblowing bgmS > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHvGy668KP0 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAFi9pK_NUA (with sir's voice) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > regards > >> > > >> > Liku > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >
[arr] Re: Question related to Pacchaikilli - Karuthamma
Of course, AR crafts/paints music, second by second. There is super detailing that goes behind a song, that its tough to capture them all at one hearing. I think every single song demands a dozen hearing. There were cases where I had felt hearing new sounds irrespective of so many times that I had listened to. Sounds that come out of the blue :). AR has said that he has used samples, which are legally meant to be used. I think the best usage would be Rangeela's Theme, which was mentioned to be a sample that AR used & built a rock solid theme around it. Man, even today, Rangeela's theme is a stunner. If "O Saya" was nominated for Oscars, why not Rangeela theme :). Damn, if Oscars could lend their ears to all the evergreens of AR, I'm sure they would give out the "Lifetime Achievement Award" for a Living Legend. Check out one of my very old post, which i had written in my blog, about our Mozart of India. Hoping you would enjoy reading it. http://kittu-mama-solraan.blogspot.com/2006/09/arrahman-revolution.html Kitcha --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "theepr" wrote: > > of course those R Digital Samples available in any instrument Or commercial > loops in computers.. Arr not only had used those for this perticular song He > had used in several other Background scores of various films May madam, > thiruda thiruda, Padiyappa , Karuthamma, May madam and Minsara Kanavu to name > a few... > Me too have wondered just like U about this stunning Mix of sounds in > particular song.There is always One answer its ArRahmans composition.. > - In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Rivjot" wrote: > > > > Everytime I listen to this song, I wonder how this song could have been > > recorded. The song has voices of almost every household animal you can name > > - Buffalo, Sheep, Goat, Chicken, Birds, Donkey.. and God knows what else. I > > just love/enjoy this song everytime I listen to. > > > > Does anyone know any story related to this song (if there is any). I dont > > think 'commerical samples' containing animal voices exist. How did ARR > > record the voices of these animals? > > >
[arr] Re: Question related to Pacchaikilli - Karuthamma
of course those R Digital Samples available in any instrument Or commercial loops in computers.. Arr not only had used those for this perticular song He had used in several other Background scores of various films May madam, thiruda thiruda, Padiyappa , Karuthamma, May madam and Minsara Kanavu to name a few... Me too have wondered just like U about this stunning Mix of sounds in particular song.There is always One answer its ArRahmans composition.. - In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Rivjot" wrote: > > Everytime I listen to this song, I wonder how this song could have been > recorded. The song has voices of almost every household animal you can name - > Buffalo, Sheep, Goat, Chicken, Birds, Donkey.. and God knows what else. I > just love/enjoy this song everytime I listen to. > > Does anyone know any story related to this song (if there is any). I dont > think 'commerical samples' containing animal voices exist. How did ARR record > the voices of these animals? >
[arr] Re: Question on a Pukar song
Kismat Se Hum Ko from film Pukar is in Raga Bimpalas. This is one of the songs discussed in the "Isai Payanam" show by Charulatha Mani. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Gaurav Venkateswar" wrote: > > I don't think it is pilu, it doesn't sound like that. i'm not sure > what raaga it is though. > > -Gaurav > > "bhushan n." wrote: > original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/arrahmanfans/?start=5439 > > > > My first guess is Raag Piloo (Hindustani name). ( Could be wild.. :-) > ) > > > > I havent checked the aroham-avaroham yet but i know 2 other > > songs in the same raga. > > > > They are > > 1) Ajahun Aaye Balama Sawan Beeta Jay ( old hindi classic - Sawan Bita > > Jaye) > > 2) Surmayee Ankhiyon Mein ( Sadma - Ilaya Raja) > > > > > > Whatever it is - "Kismat se hum" is a WONDERFULLY ROMANTIC song. > > Sonu Nigam & Anuradha P. have given so easy n soft classical touch! > > I listened to it about 15 times in a row on real audio. > > Will buy Pukar for at least this song!! > > Other songs from pukar sound so ordinary if compared with this one. > > Except for this song, the lyrics by Majrooh and Javed Akhtar are > > highly disappointing for their calibre. > > > > Bhushan. > > > > > > > "Kismat Se Hum" - Song in Pukar (Sonu Nigam & Anurada Poudwal). (A > > > great composition..) > > > > > > Which Raga is this song based on..? My first guess was that it is > > > "Sudha Dhanyasi"..But I realize that there is a "Ri" (which is not > > part > > > of the Sudha Dhanyasi Aarohanam/Avarohanam) which is used. So it > > should > > > be a different raga that I am not familiar with. Could anyone > explain > > > the differences between these 2 ragas..and what exactly is the raga > > > that this song based on..(Or is it multiple ragas..??). > > > > >
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Though ARR has not made any explicit claims on his ethical standards he certainly has called on the general public to refrain from downloading Pirated mp3s. Therefore not taking a strong stance on issues like Ghajini/Memento could end up Portraying him as subscribing to double standards and his appeal to curb piracy less effective. That's the risk he could run into. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "vivek" wrote: > > > the browsing center will defnitely be blamed if > 1.he is aware of such wrong usage of his resources or, > 2.he is not following his due diligence of recording the user's > identity > > ARR will be blamed if he gives his studio on rent despite knowing the > fact some of them use his resources wrongfully. > > ARR should do his due diligence of making sure he is not involved in > the project until the permissions for the remake are acquired. But, > like I said earlier, this may not be illegal but, unethical. > > And the question of ethics comes into picture when someone claims to > be adhering to high standards of ethics. If the claim is not made, > there is no debate. (and I do not think ARR has ever made such claims) > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Kalimuthu wrote: > > > > Your pak comparison does not make sense at all, IMO... > > > > How can the owner of the browsing center be blamed for the mail sent > > by his customer... > > > > Or the ISP for its customers' illegal access to copyrighted > materials > > > > They are just providing tools... > > > > On 12/26/08, vivek wrote: > > > > > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > > > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > > > > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly > and > > > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other > artists - > > > international or domestic. > > > > > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > > > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just > gave > > > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what > they > > > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > > > > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I > am > > > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > > > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > > > giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you > see, > > > morals are subjective". oh yeah right! > > > > > > technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... > > > > > > laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. > > > laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. > > > > > > > > > Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not > blind > > > our own judgement. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Gomzyâ¢" > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Now lets use your logic for something better. > > >> > > >> ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt > > > wanna name > > >> the MDs who use the studio. > > >> Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy > > > or rip off > > >> some guys music? (they are btw) > > >> > > >> Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner > > > possible and > > >> holding that against him. > > >> > > >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian > > > siva gopala > > >> acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < > > >> sriramiyer15@> wrote: > > >> > > >> > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely > original, > > > the > > >> > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the > > > H'wood > > >> > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > >> > "pradeepananth" > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box > > > office > > >> > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going > to > > > rake > > >> > > in a lot of moolah. > > >> > > > > >> > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay > Christopher > > >> > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the > > > producers > > >> > of > > >> > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini > > > didn't > > >> > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- > > > profile > > >> > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss > & > > > co. > > >> > > > > >> > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go > and > > >> > > acquire the rights first from the original > > > writer/director/producers > > >> > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping > off > > >> > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > > >> > audience > > >> > > to n
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
the browsing center will defnitely be blamed if 1.he is aware of such wrong usage of his resources or, 2.he is not following his due diligence of recording the user's identity ARR will be blamed if he gives his studio on rent despite knowing the fact some of them use his resources wrongfully. ARR should do his due diligence of making sure he is not involved in the project until the permissions for the remake are acquired. But, like I said earlier, this may not be illegal but, unethical. And the question of ethics comes into picture when someone claims to be adhering to high standards of ethics. If the claim is not made, there is no debate. (and I do not think ARR has ever made such claims) --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Kalimuthu wrote: > > Your pak comparison does not make sense at all, IMO... > > How can the owner of the browsing center be blamed for the mail sent > by his customer... > > Or the ISP for its customers' illegal access to copyrighted materials > > They are just providing tools... > > On 12/26/08, vivek wrote: > > > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and > > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - > > international or domestic. > > > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave > > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they > > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am > > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > > giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, > > morals are subjective". oh yeah right! > > > > technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... > > > > laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. > > laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. > > > > > > Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind > > our own judgement. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Gomzyâ¢" > > wrote: > >> > >> Now lets use your logic for something better. > >> > >> ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt > > wanna name > >> the MDs who use the studio. > >> Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy > > or rip off > >> some guys music? (they are btw) > >> > >> Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner > > possible and > >> holding that against him. > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian > > siva gopala > >> acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < > >> sriramiyer15@> wrote: > >> > >> > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, > > the > >> > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the > > H'wood > >> > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > >> > > >> > > >> > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>, > >> > "pradeepananth" > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box > > office > >> > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to > > rake > >> > > in a lot of moolah. > >> > > > >> > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > >> > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the > > producers > >> > of > >> > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini > > didn't > >> > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- > > profile > >> > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & > > co. > >> > > > >> > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > >> > > acquire the rights first from the original > > writer/director/producers > >> > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > >> > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > >> > audience > >> > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they > >> > appeal > >> > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they > > are > >> > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty > > sure > >> > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > >> > > intellectual property laws) > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off > > the > >> > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder > > if > >> > he > >> > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want > > to be > >> > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights > > of > >> > > an
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Your pak comparison does not make sense at all, IMO... How can the owner of the browsing center be blamed for the mail sent by his customer... Or the ISP for its customers' illegal access to copyrighted materials They are just providing tools... On 12/26/08, vivek wrote: > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - > international or domestic. > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, > morals are subjective". oh yeah right! > > technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... > > laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. > laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. > > > Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind > our own judgement. > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Gomzy™" > wrote: >> >> Now lets use your logic for something better. >> >> ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt > wanna name >> the MDs who use the studio. >> Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy > or rip off >> some guys music? (they are btw) >> >> Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner > possible and >> holding that against him. >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian > siva gopala >> acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < >> sriramiye...@...> wrote: >> >> > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, > the >> > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the > H'wood >> > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. >> > >> > >> > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com 40yahoogroups.com>, >> > "pradeepananth" >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box > office >> > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to > rake >> > > in a lot of moolah. >> > > >> > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher >> > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the > producers >> > of >> > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini > didn't >> > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- > profile >> > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & > co. >> > > >> > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and >> > > acquire the rights first from the original > writer/director/producers >> > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off >> > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their >> > audience >> > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they >> > appeal >> > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they > are >> > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty > sure >> > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most >> > > intellectual property laws) >> > > >> > > >> > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off > the >> > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder > if >> > he >> > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want > to be >> > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights > of >> > > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR > doesn't >> > > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources > and >> > > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. >> > > >> > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this >> > issue, >> > > that would be awesome. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > -pradeep >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > -- Sent from my very old 386 machine.
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Give me a chance of writing about ethics. Once a person went to a shop to purchased for Rs.50 and then paid him Rs 100. The shopkeeper returned 70 by mistake as a remainder. The person left the shop. It was late by when the shopkeeper realized his mistake. After a couple of days the same person went to the same shop and again purchased stuff worth Rs 50. Again he paid 100. This time the shopkeep recognized the person and returned Rs 30. Seeing the less amount the person questions the shopkeeper why is he returning Rs 20 less and it wasn't ethical. For which the shopkeeper reminded him of the incident couple of days back where he took Rs 20 more and where was his ethics then. The person was too quick to respond saying his ethics had allowed him to forgive the mistake of the shopkeeper once. But not twice of repeating the same mistake. Now you decide who is more ethical and I am sure its very much debatable. And both are right. So When AR is renting his studio and if he makes the MD sign an agreement not to use other person's work.. it nay be good ideally but whats wrong if somebody says he was inspired of another work. We too try to imitate and follow other. Memento might have also used some other story based upon Short term memory loss and vengeance. Think about Titanic itself or even the Da Vinci code.. In the former it was the ship sinking story told in its own masala and the later uses the search for Holy Grail in its own way. Da Vinci code story was claimed as a plagarism of "holy Blood Holy Grail". But the laws gave a clean chit. Now does it mean Laws are without ethics? If yes, then why are we made to follow? Known it has flaws but these flaws sometimes create much better work. It gives an opportunity for individual to sometimes use and then recreate by adding contributions. If every plagiarism was to be stopped then the first and the foremost thing that should be stopped is the university exams we make use of the content in a book, read, memorize and then write it as answers in the exam. Isn't it plagiarism? Was the answers any time our/your own? I studies in the university which has patterns of open book exams. Its the biggest plagiarism. How about ethics here? --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "pradeepananth" wrote: > > To clarify, I am not ethics police here and not accusing ARR of > anything. Just trying to get a sense for what his (and everyone's) > perspective on this is. > > I think Vivek put it really beautifully in terms of distinguishing > between laws and morals. This is really about what moral standards > does ARR subscribe to and whether there is an opportunity here for him > to hold himself and the rest of the industry to higher standards. > > Other things to consider: > > Whether Ghajini and Memento or similar or not is to be decided based > on international law and I have a strong feeling that intellectual > property experts will certainly rule this as a case of plagiarism. > > As for the related question around what happens if ARR rents his > studio out to MDs who plagiarize, its probably a good idea that ARR > writes in contracts with those MDs that indemnify him in case they are > sued over copyright infringement laws. > > As for the rice/farmer issue, the people who refuse to drink Starbucks > coffee or wear Nike shoes because of alleged violation of fair trade > laws or labor laws will certainly not want to consume the rice from > the farmer who beats up his wife. They will want to get it from more > 'ethically appropriate' sources. > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Pradeepan R" > wrote: > > > > This is completely ridiculous.If I tell you that the Rice that you > eat, is > > coming from a piece of land, owned by a farmer who beats up his Wife > > would you stop eating ?? > > Would you be willing to make an effort to find out ??!!! > > we all know for a fact that we pollute the earth by driving...isn't that > > unethical towards our future generation ? > > > > :)) lets not bring ARR into unnecessary stuff. > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, vivek wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > > > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > > > > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and > > > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - > > > international or domestic. > > > > > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > > > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave > > > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they > > > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > > > > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am > > > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > > > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > > > giving oth
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
To clarify, I am not ethics police here and not accusing ARR of anything. Just trying to get a sense for what his (and everyone's) perspective on this is. I think Vivek put it really beautifully in terms of distinguishing between laws and morals. This is really about what moral standards does ARR subscribe to and whether there is an opportunity here for him to hold himself and the rest of the industry to higher standards. Other things to consider: Whether Ghajini and Memento or similar or not is to be decided based on international law and I have a strong feeling that intellectual property experts will certainly rule this as a case of plagiarism. As for the related question around what happens if ARR rents his studio out to MDs who plagiarize, its probably a good idea that ARR writes in contracts with those MDs that indemnify him in case they are sued over copyright infringement laws. As for the rice/farmer issue, the people who refuse to drink Starbucks coffee or wear Nike shoes because of alleged violation of fair trade laws or labor laws will certainly not want to consume the rice from the farmer who beats up his wife. They will want to get it from more 'ethically appropriate' sources. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Pradeepan R" wrote: > > This is completely ridiculous.If I tell you that the Rice that you eat, is > coming from a piece of land, owned by a farmer who beats up his Wife > would you stop eating ?? > Would you be willing to make an effort to find out ??!!! > we all know for a fact that we pollute the earth by driving...isn't that > unethical towards our future generation ? > > :)) lets not bring ARR into unnecessary stuff. > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, vivek wrote: > > > > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and > > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - > > international or domestic. > > > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave > > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they > > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am > > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > > giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, > > morals are subjective". oh yeah right! > > > > technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... > > > > laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. > > laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. > > > > Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind > > our own judgement. > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > > "Gomzy" > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Now lets use your logic for something better. > > > > > > ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt > > wanna name > > > the MDs who use the studio. > > > Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy > > or rip off > > > some guys music? (they are btw) > > > > > > Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner > > possible and > > > holding that against him. > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian > > siva gopala > > > acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < > > > sriramiyer15@> wrote: > > > > > > > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, > > the > > > > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the > > H'wood > > > > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > > > > "pradeepananth" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box > > office > > > > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to > > rake > > > > > in a lot of moolah. > > > > > > > > > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > > > > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the > > producers > > > > of > > > > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini > > didn't > > > > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- > > profile > > > > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & > > co. > > > > > > > > > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > > > > > acquire the rights first from the original > > writer/director/producers > > > > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > > > > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > > > > audience > > > > > to not go for pirated
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
This is completely ridiculous.If I tell you that the Rice that you eat, is coming from a piece of land, owned by a farmer who beats up his Wife would you stop eating ?? Would you be willing to make an effort to find out ??!!! we all know for a fact that we pollute the earth by driving...isn't that unethical towards our future generation ? :)) lets not bring ARR into unnecessary stuff. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, vivek wrote: > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - > international or domestic. > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, > morals are subjective". oh yeah right! > > technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... > > laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. > laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. > > Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind > our own judgement. > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "Gomzy™" > wrote: > > > > > Now lets use your logic for something better. > > > > ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt > wanna name > > the MDs who use the studio. > > Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy > or rip off > > some guys music? (they are btw) > > > > Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner > possible and > > holding that against him. > > > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian > siva gopala > > acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < > > sriramiye...@...> wrote: > > > > > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, > the > > > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the > H'wood > > > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > > "pradeepananth" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box > office > > > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to > rake > > > > in a lot of moolah. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > > > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the > producers > > > of > > > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini > didn't > > > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- > profile > > > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & > co. > > > > > > > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > > > > acquire the rights first from the original > writer/director/producers > > > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > > > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > > > audience > > > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they > > > appeal > > > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they > are > > > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty > sure > > > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > > > > intellectual property laws) > > > > > > > > > > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off > the > > > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder > if > > > he > > > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want > to be > > > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights > of > > > > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR > doesn't > > > > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources > and > > > > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > > > > > > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this > > > issue, > > > > that would be awesome. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Cheers, Pradeepan. "All you need to do is, decide what to do with the time that is given to you !"
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Wah what a comparison? AM studio to Terrorism. One believes completely is peace loving and filled with love towards humanity, tries to unite humans. The other exactly believes in the opposite. Your thought itself speaks out you didn't do it right. Also ethics of killing is different than the art. So is the law. If I have to speak in your words get this fact Kalashnikov invented the gun for protecting his motherland from the hands of enemies. Will his ethics be questioned if its used for killing innocent? Scientists strive hard to develop theories & science should they be executed if their work is used for mass destruction? --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "vivek" wrote: > > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - > international or domestic. > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, > morals are subjective". oh yeah right! > > technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... > > laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. > laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. > > > Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind > our own judgement. > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Gomzy" > wrote: > > > > Now lets use your logic for something better. > > > > ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt > wanna name > > the MDs who use the studio. > > Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy > or rip off > > some guys music? (they are btw) > > > > Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner > possible and > > holding that against him. > > > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian > siva gopala > > acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < > > sriramiyer15@> wrote: > > > > > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, > the > > > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the > H'wood > > > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "pradeepananth" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box > office > > > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to > rake > > > > in a lot of moolah. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > > > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the > producers > > > of > > > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini > didn't > > > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- > profile > > > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & > co. > > > > > > > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > > > > acquire the rights first from the original > writer/director/producers > > > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > > > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > > > audience > > > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they > > > appeal > > > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they > are > > > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty > sure > > > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > > > > intellectual property laws) > > > > > > > > > > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off > the > > > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder > if > > > he > > > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want > to be > > > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights > of > > > > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR > doesn't > > > > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources > and > > > > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > > > > > > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this > > > issue, > > > > that would be awesome. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
You are listening to songs of a guy who promotes people who break copyright laws. You are not only encouraging him but also an accomplice. Partner in crime! Now how about your ethics? On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 4:25 AM, vivek wrote: > > Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware > that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. > > Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and > intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - > international or domestic. > > well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of > terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave > them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they > do". Do you think it is acceptable? > > A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am > not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no > wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is > giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, > morals are subjective". oh yeah right! > > technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... > > laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. > laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. > > Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind > our own judgement. > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "Gomzy™" > wrote: > > > > > Now lets use your logic for something better. > > > > ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt > wanna name > > the MDs who use the studio. > > Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy > or rip off > > some guys music? (they are btw) > > > > Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner > possible and > > holding that against him. > > > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian > siva gopala > > acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < > > sriramiye...@...> wrote: > > > > > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, > the > > > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the > H'wood > > > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > > "pradeepananth" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box > office > > > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to > rake > > > > in a lot of moolah. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > > > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the > producers > > > of > > > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini > didn't > > > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- > profile > > > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & > co. > > > > > > > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > > > > acquire the rights first from the original > writer/director/producers > > > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > > > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > > > audience > > > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they > > > appeal > > > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they > are > > > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty > sure > > > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > > > > intellectual property laws) > > > > > > > > > > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off > the > > > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder > if > > > he > > > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want > to be > > > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights > of > > > > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR > doesn't > > > > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources > and > > > > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > > > > > > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this > > > issue, > > > > that would be awesome. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -pradeep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying "oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do". Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say "I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong". The other guy would say, "I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, morals are subjective". oh yeah right! technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind our own judgement. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "Gomzy" wrote: > > Now lets use your logic for something better. > > ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name > the MDs who use the studio. > Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off > some guys music? (they are btw) > > Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and > holding that against him. > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala > acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < > sriramiye...@...> wrote: > > > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the > > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood > > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > > "pradeepananth" > > wrote: > > > > > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office > > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake > > > in a lot of moolah. > > > > > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers > > of > > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't > > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- profile > > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & co. > > > > > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > > > acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers > > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > > audience > > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they > > appeal > > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are > > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure > > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > > > intellectual property laws) > > > > > > > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the > > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if > > he > > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be > > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of > > > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't > > > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and > > > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > > > > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this > > issue, > > > that would be awesome. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > -pradeep > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . < sriramiye...@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the > basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood > flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "pradeepananth" > wrote: > > > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake > > in a lot of moolah. > > > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers > of > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & co. > > > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > > acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > audience > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they > appeal > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > > intellectual property laws) > > > > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if > he > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of > > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't > > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and > > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this > issue, > > that would be awesome. > > > > Thoughts? > > -pradeep > > > > >
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
2008-12-26
Thread
ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni .
What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "pradeepananth" wrote: > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake > in a lot of moolah. > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & co. > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their audience > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > intellectual property laws) > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, > that would be awesome. > > Thoughts? > -pradeep >
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
You totally got him wrong... he is NOT speaking about ARR's music at all... read carefully what he has written... its quiet shocking actually... " The search is more important than the destination " - a r rahman - --- On Fri, 26/12/08, rayrai2k wrote: From: rayrai2k Subject: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR... To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 26 December, 2008, 12:28 PM Are you questioning AR's ethics? I dont think he ripped the music anywhere from Memento. You should be asking the question to its producers and the story writers. Why AR? To avoid downloading and using pirated music, movie or software is individual ethics. You might be using softwares are you 100% sure that theres no pirated software or there is any software installed and used according to the norms in the agreement? Your question to AR can be solicited only if he had anywhere used the music from the predecessor. --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, "pradeepananth" wrote: > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake > in a lot of moolah. > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & co. > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/ producers > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their audience > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > intellectual property laws) > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, > that would be awesome. > > Thoughts? > -pradeep Recent Activity 51 New Members 1 New Polls Visit Your Group Ads on Yahoo! Learn more now. Reach customers searching for you. Y! Messenger Want a quick chat? Chat over IM with group members. Group Charity i-SAFE Keep your kids safer online . Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Isnt it the responsibility of the Producers of the Movie. ?. why should AR bother about all these ? May be he left all these issues to the Producers of the movie... I think its a grave sin to question AR's ethics. and Pls dont use the words " Rip Off" for AR. It really hurts. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:28 PM, rayrai2k wrote: > Are you questioning AR's ethics? I dont think he ripped the music > anywhere from Memento. You should be asking the question to its > producers and the story writers. Why AR? > To avoid downloading and using pirated music, movie or software is > individual ethics. > You might be using softwares are you 100% sure that theres no pirated > software or there is any software installed and used according to the > norms in the agreement? > Your question to AR can be solicited only if he had anywhere used the > music from the predecessor. > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "pradeepananth" > wrote: > > > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office > > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake > > in a lot of moolah. > > > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers > of > > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't > > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile > > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & co. > > > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > > acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers > > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their > audience > > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they > appeal > > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are > > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure > > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > > intellectual property laws) > > > > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the > > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if > he > > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be > > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of > > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't > > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and > > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this > issue, > > that would be awesome. > > > > Thoughts? > > -pradeep > > > > > -- regards, Vithur
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Are you questioning AR's ethics? I dont think he ripped the music anywhere from Memento. You should be asking the question to its producers and the story writers. Why AR? To avoid downloading and using pirated music, movie or software is individual ethics. You might be using softwares are you 100% sure that theres no pirated software or there is any software installed and used according to the norms in the agreement? Your question to AR can be solicited only if he had anywhere used the music from the predecessor. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "pradeepananth" wrote: > > So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office > records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake > in a lot of moolah. > > As far as I know, Murugadoss & Co. did not quite pay Christopher > Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of > Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't > quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile > nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss & co. > > In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and > acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers > before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off > others' "intellectual property", why should they expect their audience > to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal > to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are > doing is by no means "legal"? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure > that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most > intellectual property laws) > > > Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the > story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he > ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be > associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of > another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't > appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and > not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. > > Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, > that would be awesome. > > Thoughts? > -pradeep >
Re: [arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
Dear Chander Welcome back to INDIA... My number is 9840273894.. Surely we can meet... You should contact Abdul Hakeem for the T Shirts On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:48 PM, chandersai_2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Thanks Guys, > > Your responses were definitely convincing. > > Vithur,Let me know your contact details.Will give you a buzz when I > reach India.[2nd week of Dec.] > > Guys,I require two of those ARR TShirts that you guys sport. > > Could you guys let me know,Who could organise for this? I will be > reaching Bangalore in the 2nd week of Dec. > > Thanks > > Chander > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > U can right away buy Pray for Me books for 100$. You have won it. > Its Benny > > dayal.. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:21 AM, chandersai_2k > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > This is getting trickier now after "Edwards" reponse. > > > > > > Need more responses Guys > > > > > > A $100 bet at stake!.. > > > > > > Will donate a part of it to "KM Foundation" when I travel to > India in > > > December. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Chander > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "edwardian10" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > Can you believe me the same question popped in to my mind. I > think > > > > it's ARR. > > > > > > > > TC. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com > > > > 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "chandersai_2k" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > > > > > > > > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > > > > > > > > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > > > > > > > > > I claim "Benny" > > > > > > > > > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > > > > > > > > > Responses guys?? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Chander > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > regards, > > Vithur > > > > > -- regards, Vithur
[arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
Thanks Guys, Your responses were definitely convincing. Vithur,Let me know your contact details.Will give you a buzz when I reach India.[2nd week of Dec.] Guys,I require two of those ARR TShirts that you guys sport. Could you guys let me know,Who could organise for this? I will be reaching Bangalore in the 2nd week of Dec. Thanks Chander --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > U can right away buy Pray for Me books for 100$. You have won it. Its Benny > dayal.. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:21 AM, chandersai_2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > This is getting trickier now after "Edwards" reponse. > > > > Need more responses Guys > > > > A $100 bet at stake!.. > > > > Will donate a part of it to "KM Foundation" when I travel to India in > > December. > > > > Thanks > > > > Chander > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > > "edwardian10" > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > Can you believe me the same question popped in to my mind. I think > > > it's ARR. > > > > > > TC. > > > > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > > "chandersai_2k" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > > > > > > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > > > > > > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > > > > > > > I claim "Benny" > > > > > > > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > > > > > > > Responses guys?? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Chander > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > regards, > Vithur >
Re: [arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
U can right away buy Pray for Me books for 100$. You have won it. Its Benny dayal.. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:21 AM, chandersai_2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Guys, > > This is getting trickier now after "Edwards" reponse. > > Need more responses Guys > > A $100 bet at stake!.. > > Will donate a part of it to "KM Foundation" when I travel to India in > December. > > Thanks > > Chander > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "edwardian10" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > Can you believe me the same question popped in to my mind. I think > > it's ARR. > > > > TC. > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "chandersai_2k" > > wrote: > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > > > > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > > > > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > > > > > I claim "Benny" > > > > > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > > > > > Responses guys?? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Chander > > > > > > > > -- regards, Vithur
Re: [arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
Its Benny Dayal. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:21 AM, chandersai_2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Guys, > > This is getting trickier now after "Edwards" reponse. > > Need more responses Guys > > A $100 bet at stake!.. > > Will donate a part of it to "KM Foundation" when I travel to India in > December. > > Thanks > > Chander > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "edwardian10" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > > Can you believe me the same question popped in to my mind. I think > > it's ARR. > > > > TC. > > > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com , > "chandersai_2k" > > wrote: > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > > > > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > > > > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > > > > > I claim "Benny" > > > > > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > > > > > Responses guys?? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Chander > > > > > > > >
[arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
Guys, This is getting trickier now after "Edwards" reponse. Need more responses Guys A $100 bet at stake!.. Will donate a part of it to "KM Foundation" when I travel to India in December. Thanks Chander --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "edwardian10" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > Can you believe me the same question popped in to my mind. I think > it's ARR. > > TC. > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "chandersai_2k" > wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > > > I claim "Benny" > > > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > > > Responses guys?? > > > > Thanks > > > > Chander > > >
[arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
Hi there, Can you believe me the same question popped in to my mind. I think it's ARR. TC. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "chandersai_2k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > I claim "Benny" > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > Responses guys?? > > Thanks > > Chander >
[arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
that part is sung by Benny .. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "chandersai_2k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > I claim "Benny" > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > Responses guys?? > > Thanks > > Chander >
[arr] Re: Question about Yuvvraaj "Tu Meri Dost hai" song - Responses appreciated
You are right, Benny Dayal. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "chandersai_2k" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, > > It's been a week long debate between my wife and me. > > "Tu Meri Dost Hai" > > Who has sung the starting bit? "Oh O O 0 o".. > > I claim "Benny" > > My wife claims "ARR"... > > Responses guys?? > > Thanks > > Chander >
Re: [arr] Re: question of a song - from aamir khan blog
Add another song n place it where? As it is I felt I was watching 'A Juke Box". Songs seemed to be overlapping. Though all the songs were pleasing yet they just were piled on there. Mahiya --- On Mon, 7/14/08, vivijay23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: vivijay23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [arr] Re: question of a song - from aamir khan blog To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, July 14, 2008, 6:46 AM Dear, i think we Should add this song, the film is too good by story ,acting, songs ,music, direction this song would give us more attention and more interest vijay
[arr] Re: question of a song - from aamir khan blog
Dear, i think we Should add this song, the film is too good by story ,acting, songs ,music, direction this song would give us more attention and more interest vijay
Re: [arr] Re: question on Roja and credits
*She has changed her spe3lling to Annupamaa due to numerological beliefs. Her full name had not been disclosed in her professional career. But being knowing her as a friend, I know her full name.She is NOT Anupama Deshpande. She is Annupamaa Krishnaswami..*
Re: [arr] Re: question on Roja and credits
yeah it's only Anupama and not Anupama Deshpande. only tfmpage was showing it as Anupama Deshpande. Rahmanji's site shows it right. - Original Message From: kishore parayath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, 15 May, 2008 1:03:58 PM Subject: Re: [arr] Re: question on Roja and credits Wel... As I said, Annupamaa(The singer of Chandralekhaa in Thiruda Thiruda) is my friend, and she told me this..She is very close to Rahman... What better source do you want??? Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go to http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php/
Re: [arr] Re: question on Roja and credits
Wel... As I said, Annupamaa(The singer of Chandralekhaa in Thiruda Thiruda) is my friend, and she told me this..She is very close to Rahman... What better source do you want???
Re: [arr] Re: question on Roja and credits
Anish/Kishore, Sorry that I don't know your credentials. Can you please give the source of your information? On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM, kishore parayath < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *Pudhu Vellai Mazhai/ Yeh haseen Wadiyaa.. was SOLEY by ARR* > *Naveen had contributed for Chinna CHinna asai and Kadhal > RojaveSIVAMANI had contributed for RUKKUMANI* > >
Re: [arr] Re: question on Roja and credits
*Pudhu Vellai Mazhai/ Yeh haseen Wadiyaa.. was SOLEY by ARR* *Naveen had contributed for Chinna CHinna asai and Kadhal RojaveSIVAMANI had contributed for RUKKUMANI*
[arr] Re: question on Roja and credits
Dear All, Roja track might be solely by rahman. But when comes to the musicians, navin and many other like shivamani had contributed.The trumphet for tamilza tamliza was played by max Please do not get it worng. The initial base track was done by arr himself. But at a later stage...other musicians contribution was added. Shashi --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Ramesh R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ARR has said in interviews that when he was to record songs for Roja the first time, none of the musicians turned up and he did everything himself on his synthesizers. I was trying to find out if he did end up doing everything from songs and score (BGM) all by himself or did he make use of some musicians (did the musicians turn up for some other day) for Roja? Was the score for Roja done entirely in synth? Anyone remember this? I checked the credits for Roja at the discography in www.arrahman.com and there didn't seem to be anything aside from song name, singers and lyricist. > > And this leads to another question-- which was the first soundtrack release of ARR to have credits of all musicians? >
[arr] Re: question from malaysia
you can get it in little india for example lakshmi video and allmost all the video shop there --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, apekejadahnye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > where can i find hindi/tamil DVD in penang?bukit jambul got many shops but its all english/chineese title.. > mr usop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: any1 know when godfather audio released in malaysia? > - > Yahoo! Photos NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo. > > Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic. > Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community. > > Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com > Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Christian music artists Music artists Country music artists New country music artists New music artists Unsigned music artist > > - > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > Visit your group "arrahmanfans" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > - > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic. Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community. Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[arr] Re: question
Rhythm does not have a dubbed or remade Hindi equivalent. However, few songs were reused in an unrelated film called Lakeer. Aiyo Pathikitchu was Uffho Jalta Hai Thaniye was Nachley Kaatre was Paighaam Gopal. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "sdavies0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the Hindi version of ARR's Tamil "Rhythm" album? > > Stevan Davies > Professor of Religious Studies > College Misericordia > Dallas, PA USA > Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic. Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community. Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
