Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error?

One additional information: user does not even receive any error or warning. On Oct 1, 3:25 am, LJ LongWing lj.longw...@gmail.com wrote: But there is WAY too little time between the select and the rollback to have requested user feedback and have received ittalking less than a tenth of a

WOI:WOI:CreateSetRequestor_106_Group Issue

Good morning, I've run into an error with Work Order 7.5 where if you belong to a support group that is a part of a different company, you can't submit a Work Order because your support group doesn't match up with your company. Specifically, I'm trying to use a Work Order Template that has

WWRUG 2010: Just two weeks away!

Yes it seems like only yesterday it was months. We have an amazing schedule, Phil and Lenny have been working hard putting on the finishing touches, our Vendor Showcase has new vendors, new technology and all the technical information you need, so if you haven't decided to go yet you should.

[no subject]

http://csimanagement.it/mor1.html ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

Re: Is there any explanation for Canceled filter processing due to error?

The interaction is that the user gets an ERROR indicating that there was a conflict and then they get the choice. If they say to continue, the operation is performed again. If they cancel it is not performed again. So, the time is immediate -- error on the conflict (and a rollback) and then the

Re: Table field content change Execution Option

Interesting... So you see the option? Is it right there in the Execution Options section? Here is a screen prints of the form (it has two editable columns which posed some challenges) and the AL in DS. (apologies to those that cannot get to Picasa)

CMDB 2.0 application vs. application system

What is the difference between BMC.CORE:BMC_Application and BMC.CORE:BMC_ApplicationSystem? I am looking for docs that specify the definition of each. But can't find it.. going to BMCs site now but perhaps someone out there knows TIA, Marcelo

Re: Table field content change Execution Option

I think the issue here is a misreading/misunderstanding of the feature. This feature -- as confirmed by another posting -- does work in the 7.5 and later (I think it was added in 7.5) releases. It is when the TABLE FIELD content changes. Not when an editable cell in an editable column in a

Re: Developer Studio without any perspective

Hi, I had the same problem some days before. Be aware, that you are using the correct java version, 1.6 or newer. Tristan ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com

Re: Table field content change Execution Option

Thanks as always Doug. I have a few questions. What conditions need to be met for this option to appear in Dev Studio? I have the table field selected as the Field in the AL and I have tried using the column as well. The documentation appear to contradict your statement When the table contents

Re: Table field content change Execution Option

Just for giggles I opened the 7.6.03 Workflow Objects Guide and there is no reference to Table field content change like there is in the 7.5 guide (I find it 3 times, once in the Active links: Execution options for request and window actions table and twice in the Index). Jason On Fri, Oct 1,

Please Delete the [ No Subject ] Email from this Account Today

All: Please pardon the spam email from this account today. The account has been secured again. Looks like my password got hacked, sigh. Perils of keeping the same email address for 10+ years, I suppose. Sorry, --Phil