Doug,
From what I'm understanding, this feature is currently geared toward
whether or not the associated records exist. Any chance it could develop
into also being data-focused? For example, let's say you have a People
form and someone's Full Name changes. You could then define associations
to
Rick,
Again, having only read some of the docs, it looks like they are moving
toward a flatter version of the CMDB, and I'd guess that would continue
with each version. Years ago, there was a 3rd party product called
Enterprise Service Suite or ESS@Work (John - is that what you were thinking
It's been a few years since I took the Force.com trainingbut I seem to
remember that you could say something similar to 'I want this field on this
form to be the value on that form (here is the definition of how to get the
other value 'association')and then from that point forward, the two
Greetings All,
Has anyone had any success with data migration into CMDB 8.1.02 we have tried
AIE, AI and Spoon to no avail. We can use Migrator but that has some issues
because we can't migrate from/to a join. This is 7.6.03 to 8.1.02.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Michelle
I have also heard this plan (probably from the same source). It can be
tricky though, there are times you want the historical value of some data
to remain the same. For example a person's location or department. If they
move to a different site and department over the years you don't want their
Rick,
I wasn't discussing things that 9.x is doing...i was expounding on an idea
that Thad was discussing regarding synchronizing datajust a
thought...not something they are currently doing, or to the best of my
knowledge, something they plan on doing :)
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Rick
The same field id could exist on multiple forms with different field
lengths, and as Jarl said, you need to include the schema id. Curious
though, do you need the subquery? How about:
select C.SCHEMAID, C.NAME, A.FIELDNAME, A.FIELDID, B.MAXLENGTH
from FIELD A, FIELD_CHAR B, ARSCHEMA C where
Nevermind.. I was not thinking right..
select C.SCHEMAID, C.NAME, A.FIELDNAME, A.FIELDID, B.MAXLENGTH from FIELD A,
FIELD_CHAR B, ARSCHEMA C where
(A.SCHEMAID = C.SCHEMAID) and
(A.SCHEMAID = B.SCHEMAID) and
(A.FIELDID = B.FIELDID) and
(A.FIELDID = 100 AND A.FIELDID = 199) and
Had a user set his approval to this the other day and nothing went out to
anyone (Manager or Coordinator). Went looking for a notification thinking I
may have turned it off. Could not find anything that matched. Is there one?
--
Thank You,
Chris Danaceau
FINRA
240-386-6728 (desk)
PL check under AP:Administration if you see AP:Notifications
It should be there
Regards,
Abhijeet
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Danaceau, Chris
Sent: 15 May 2015 23:44
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Notification for More
Yes I was not thinking right. I had that subquery before I developed the
whole query and left it there and then didn't think it was not required once
I brought more tables into the query.
I changed it exactly to what you have down there when Jarl pointed out what
I was not looking at :-).
So, it's changing the degree of normalization of the data model. That
doesn't sound quite like what Remedy is doing in v9, but it seems to be
moving in that direction. For better or worse, that structure has defined
Remedy from its competitors through the years.
Rick
On May 15, 2015 9:17 AM, LJ
I have developed this query for listing all global fields (regular and
window specific) that are either of 0 length or input length above 1000.
select C.SCHEMAID, C.NAME, A.FIELDNAME, A.FIELDID, B.MAXLENGTH from FIELD A,
FIELD_CHAR B, ARSCHEMA C where
(A.SCHEMAID = C.SCHEMAID) and
Hi
This subquery will list all the fields from all the forms You need to
include the schemaid
(A.FIELDID in (select B.FIELDID from FIELD_CHAR B where B.MAXLENGTH = 0 or B
.MAXLENGTH = 1000))
--
J
2015-05-15 19:13 GMT+02:00 Joe D'Souza jdso...@shyle.net:
**
I have developed this query
Correct, ITSM is installed and actively using Incident, Change
Problem with heavy customizations and a fully customized front end for
non-Service Desk users.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Jason Miller jason.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
**
This sounds more like an ITSM system?
On May 13, 2015
15 matches
Mail list logo
