Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Andrew C Goodall
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:36 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: 32bit Vs.64bit
@ARSLIST.ORG] Im Auftrag von strauss
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2012 19:21
An: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Betreff: Re: 32bit Vs.64bit JVM performance
**
The three mid-tiers we deployed into production in August and September last
year are all 64-bit:
Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64 Sp2
Goodall
Sent: 17 January 2012 23:06
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: 32bit Vs.64bit JVM performance
That makes sense, thanks.
Regards,
Andrew Goodall
Software Engineer 2 | Development Services | jcpenney . www.jcp.com
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list
I'm soliciting feedback regarding experience observed in the field regarding
migrating from 32bit JVM to 64bit processes - is it worth it?
So we'll be upgrading from 7.5 32bit to 7.6.04 64bit (on Windows 2008), our
major objective is to drastically improve client performance.
Due to BMC
If you are running out of memory with a 32-bit jvm, you need to move
to a 64-bit jvm. This happens with the midtier when the size of your
concurrent user base exceeds a certain number. Moving to 64-bit will
not help performance in any way by the mere virtue of moving to
64-bit. 64-bit is all
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: 32bit Vs.64bit JVM performance
If you are running out of memory with a 32-bit jvm, you need to move
to a 64-bit jvm. This happens with the midtier when the size of your
concurrent user base exceeds a certain number. Moving to 64-bit will
not help performance
6 matches
Mail list logo
