Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs

2010-09-17 Thread Smith, David A
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Axton Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 9:17 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs ** If you can afford it, you should use separate physical hardware for your production and non-production infrastructure. There are still things that you will have

Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs

2010-09-15 Thread Axton
There shouldn't be any technical reason that will stop you from doing this. Can I ask why you are moving towards LDOM instead of zones? The higher models, like T5440, support i/o domains, which are really cool and have some real benefits because the machine can be partitioned at the bus layer

Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs

2010-09-15 Thread Smith, David A
) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Axton Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:03 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs ** There shouldn't be any technical reason that will stop you from doing this. Can I ask why you are moving towards LDOM instead of zones? The higher

Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs

2010-09-15 Thread Axton
list(ARSList) [mailto: arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Axton *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:03 AM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs ** There shouldn't be any technical reason that will stop you from doing this. Can I ask why you are moving towards

ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs

2010-09-14 Thread Smith, David A
Hello all, We our running our ARS production environment on a Sun enterprise 5120 server (Solaris 10) and are considering configuring the server with two LDOMs; possibility setting them up in a server group or production/development. I've contacted BMC support to find out if this configuration