...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 9:17 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs
**
If you can afford it, you should use separate physical hardware for your
production and non-production infrastructure. There are still things that you
will have
There shouldn't be any technical reason that will stop you from doing this.
Can I ask why you are moving towards LDOM instead of zones?
The higher models, like T5440, support i/o domains, which are really cool
and have some real benefits because the machine can be partitioned at the
bus layer
)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:03 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs
** There shouldn't be any technical reason that will stop you from doing this.
Can I ask why you are moving towards LDOM instead of zones?
The higher
list(ARSList) [mailto:
arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Axton
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:03 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: ARS 7.6 - Solaris LDOMs
** There shouldn't be any technical reason that will stop you from doing
this. Can I ask why you are moving towards
Hello all,
We our running our ARS production environment on a Sun enterprise 5120 server
(Solaris 10) and are considering configuring the server with two LDOMs;
possibility setting them up in a server group or production/development. I've
contacted BMC support to find out if this configuration
5 matches
Mail list logo