Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-27 Thread Mueller, Doug
of the page. But, not for the “indirect” data from tables and attachments. Doug From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 2:04 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> Subject: Re: ARS 9.1: Question a

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-27 Thread Thomas Miskiewicz
at the fieldID is not > in the view and so take no action quietly. > > If you are getting an error or failure of the screen, this is not what I > would expect. > > Doug > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [ > mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Be

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-27 Thread Mueller, Doug
from tables and attachments. Doug From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 2:04 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields ** I have seen similar behavior when using

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-27 Thread Jarl Grøneng
ion list(ARSList) [ > mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] *On Behalf Of *Thomas > Miskiewicz > *Sent:* Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:01 AM > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields > > ** > Hi Doug, > > you said:

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-27 Thread Thomas Miskiewicz
ould expect. > > Doug > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of Thomas > Miskiewicz > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:01 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLI

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-27 Thread Mueller, Doug
(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Thomas Miskiewicz Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:01 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields ** Hi Doug, you said: "As has been noted this is NOT security, the *field is still fully acces

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-26 Thread Fawver, Dustin
com> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 6:00 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields ** Hi Doug, you said: "As has been noted this is NOT security, the *field is still fully accessible to the user* it is just not possible to show it on the screen from th

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2017-01-26 Thread Thomas Miskiewicz
[mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Brittain, Mark > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:23 PM > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields > > > > ** > > Dustin, > > > > A field that is not in the view does no

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2016-11-23 Thread Andrew Hicox
things in view that have the > possibility of being displayed under some condition. > > > > Doug Mueller > > > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Brittain, Mark > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2016-11-23 Thread LJ LongWing
As a general suggestion, if a field is NEVER visible on the screen, I >> strongly suggest you have it not in view. It reduces overhead and makes >> the system more efficient. Only have things in view that have the >> possibility of being displayed under some condition. >

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2016-11-23 Thread Andrew Hicox
ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Brittain, Mark > *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:23 PM > > > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields > > > > ** > > Dustin, > > > > A field that is not

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2016-11-22 Thread Mueller, Doug
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields ** Dustin, A field that is not in the view does not appear in the Field menu for an Advanced Search. So this might be a good way to limit what users are searching on. Of course if you have a savy user they can always type

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2016-11-18 Thread Brittain, Mark
who does that. Mark From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 3:02 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields ** Dustin, The main advantage is the fact

Re: ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2016-11-18 Thread LJ LongWing
Dustin, The main advantage is the fact that the field isn't taking up any screen real estate anywhere on the form. The object still exists on the form, is still transferred to the client, so it's not a transport advantage, but the fact that the field's not cluttering up the display is a

ARS 9.1: Question about hiding fields

2016-11-18 Thread Fawver, Dustin
Greetings! During my analysis of workflow for the migration to ARS 9.1, I have found that fields can be hidden in several ways. - Hidden explicitly by the field's properties - Placed in a panel page that the user doesn't not have permissions to. - Removed from the user's view - The field