Re: AW: ARERR 298 "Too Many Filter" since upgrade to 7.1

2009-09-16 Thread Shellman, David
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Peter Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:42 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: AW: ARERR 298 "Too Many Filter" since upgrade to 7.1 The risk that BMC are referring to is probably the risk of filter loops. If you are confident that your code doesn&

Re: AW: ARERR 298 "Too Many Filter" since upgrade to 7.1

2009-09-16 Thread Ben Chernys
Subject: Re: AW: ARERR 298 "Too Many Filter" since upgrade to 7.1 The risk that BMC are referring to is probably the risk of filter loops. If you are confident that your code doesn't have any loops then the value for this parameter is probably not too important. > David, >

Re: AW: ARERR 298 "Too Many Filter" since upgrade to 7.1

2009-09-16 Thread Peter Romain
The risk that BMC are referring to is probably the risk of filter loops. If you are confident that your code doesn't have any loops then the value for this parameter is probably not too important. > David, > > we noticed the same problem after upgrading to 7.1(from 6.3). I did some > investigat

AW: ARERR 298 "Too Many Filter" since upgrade to 7.1

2009-09-15 Thread Conny Martin
David, we noticed the same problem after upgrading to 7.1(from 6.3). I did some investigations and found out that before 7.1 only filters were counted if the at least one action of the filter was executed. In 7.1 every filter is counted regardless if an action is executed or not. We multiplied