, it also makes the new structure a bit less usable in a way.
-Guillaume Rheault
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of SCOTT
PHILBEN
Sent: Fri 01/16/09 11:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Accounting for Virtual Servers in the CMDB
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Accounting for Virtual Servers in the CMDB
RE: Accounting for Virtual Servers in the CMDBI agree with Guillaume's
approach on storing both the physical and virtual servers in the same place.
It makes searching/finding configuration items a lot easier for someone who
makes the new structure a
bit less usable in a way.
-Guillaume Rheault
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of SCOTT PHILBEN
Sent: Fri 01/16/09 11:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Accounting for Virtual Servers in the CMDB
Is anyone
less usable in a way.
-Guillaume Rheault
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of SCOTT PHILBEN
Sent: Fri 01/16/09 11:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Accounting for Virtual Servers in the CMDB
Is anyone using the CMDB (2.1 patch 004
AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Accounting for Virtual Servers in the CMDB
**
We have the virtual servers in the computer system class, just like
physical servers. To identify whether it is a physical server or a virtual
server, we use the product name and the manufacturer
Is anyone using the CMDB (2.1 patch 004) and Asset application (7.0.3 patch
008) to account for virtual servers? Does anyone have a white paper with some
best practices that I could steal? There seems to be classes that are related
to Virtual servers (System--Virtual System for example) but how
If you install the help files for CMDB, they include detailed information on
the data model, including the purpose of each class and attribute. This is
very helpful when trying to map CI types to existing classes.
Regards,
Chuck Baldi
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, SCOTT PHILBEN
7 matches
Mail list logo
