] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
Wikipedia.com also has a definition for most things.
And that list does include fubar too. But I will not repeat the definition
in polite
Of Kathy Morris
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:48 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
This has been a SOX requirement for us. When a Change has been approved
based upon certain conditions, we do not want someone modifying the
attachments later
Is there a way to keep the users from modifying the attachments? We have a
similar issue. Our business requirement is that only the submitter can
modify his/her own attachment. No other user should be able to modify an
attachment or locking the attachment after the submission.
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Kathy Morris
Sent: Tue 8/7/2007 2:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
**
Is there a way to keep the users from modifying the attachments? We have a
similar issue. Our business requirement is that only
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
Hi Kathy,
You can control access to attachments in two ways. One use permissions like
any other field. Set the permissions for the Attachment Field to Submitter
to allow only the Submitter to update the field.
In the Attachment Pool you can
it?
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed LeBlanc
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:00 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
Hi Kathy,
You can control access to attachments in two ways. One use
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
Even if you adjust the function so that saving to disk is not
displayed, a user can still save the attachment to their hard drive if
they select View right? Once the attachment is opened the customer
could print it or save
from changing the one in Remedy meet your requirements?
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:47 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
I
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
As far as I know as long as an extenal program (i.e. Word, Excel
Lisa,
Not that I love these ideas... but maybe you can find some solution
down one of these trails... ( The real issue appears to not be a
technical problem. Rather the users do not like reality. :( )
What if you add a View button that actually launches a URL? That
would _hopefully_ tell your
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: Attachement Updation
Lisa,
Not that I love these ideas... but maybe you can find some solution
down one of these trails... ( The real issue appears to not be a
technical problem. Rather the users do not like reality. :( )
What if you add a View
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:09 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
Lisa,
Not that I love these ideas... but maybe you can find some solution down
one of these trails... ( The real issue appears to not be a technical
problem
Of Tony Worthington
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:19 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
What about setting a view field to the contents of the attachment?
--
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911
Carey Matthew Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Action
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:09 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
Lisa,
Not that I love these ideas... but maybe you can find some solution
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 4:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
A View field is still using the associated application so
, Lisa
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 4:21 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
FYI: As long as it is displayed on the screen a person can capture it
to send it to the printer using Alt-PrintScreen.
Fred, this is very true as well. They could also paste the capture
@ARSLIST.ORG
08/07/2007 03:15 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: Attachement Updation
A View field is still using the associated application so usually a
Right Click would still allow printing and saving.
If the Documents were saved as Adobe PDF then you
This has been a SOX requirement for us. When a Change has been approved
based upon certain conditions, we do not want someone modifying the
attachments
later.
** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
Meenakshinathan ,
Maybe.
An active link that fires on Gain Focus for each attachment field
could put a flag in a hidden field so that the right attachment field
could be used in the active link on the button. The flag might even be
the FieldID keyword. But I have not tested it and I do not
Does anyone know if this is in an enhancement somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:39 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
Meenakshinathan ,
Maybe.
An active link that fires on Gain Focus for each attachment field
could put a flag in a hidden field so that the right attachment field
could be used in the active link on the button. The flag might
, August 03, 2007 11:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
**
Entirely off of this topic...but it would be PERFORM-ACTION-FUBAR
:)
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *L. J. Head
*Sent:* Friday, August 03, 2007 11:19 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
** Entirely off of this topic
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
**
Hugo had it correct. He is referring to FOOBAR which is a reference often
used with perl and probably most of the older programming languages.
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:54 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
**
Ah...well I'm familiar with FOO but I didn't know about FOOBAR...must be
a programmer jokesorry I didn't get it the first time
Entirely off of this topic...but it would be PERFORM-ACTION-FUBAR
:)
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hugo Visser
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 2:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File
= 'ATTACH16929'
HTH someone.
Stephen
--
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Hugo Visser
*Sent:* Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:15 AM
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* Re: Attachement Updation
At times, Wikipedia suffers from obfuscatory prolix where style is
concerned.
On 8/3/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** From Wikipedia
Foobar is a common placeholder name also referred to as metasyntactic
variable used in computer programming or computer related documentation.
, August 02, 2007 5:15 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: Attachement Updation
** You cannot compare the file contents, but using TR you should be able
to detect that a file was attached again (if the DB value wasn't $NULL$).
The value contains the file size in bytes, the compressed size
Just a thought, but instead of attaching the files directly to the request
you are on, what if it was a child form, with a Submit-Only, single field,
attachment pool?
This way, to upload a new attachment, a new child record has to be created,
and you know who when did it. This would also keep
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hugo Visser
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 4:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: OT: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
** Stephen,
That's very clever, thanks for sharing :) Maybe
(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Stonequist
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:19 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
**
Just a thought, but instead of attaching the files directly to the
request you are on, what if it was a child
Wikipedia.com also has a definition for most things.
And that list does include fubar too. But I will not repeat the
definition in polite company. :) So reader beware if you go looking
for it.
Maybe Kinetic Data can have a survey to find out if people think more
of FooBar or Fubar when they think
: Attachement Updation - File Contents Changed
Wikipedia.com also has a definition for most things.
And that list does include fubar too. But I will not repeat the definition
in polite company. :) So reader beware if you go looking for it.
Maybe Kinetic Data can have a survey to find out if people
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the information.
Anyhow this solution is not working. Remedy stores the attachments in
the following way number of characters,no of bytes(i am sure. but
it might bytes),filename with extenstion.
I am not user this TR and DB can apply for attachement fields.
can any one
You cannot compare the file contents, but using TR you should be able to
detect that a file was attached again (if the DB value wasn't $NULL$). The
value contains the file size in bytes, the compressed size in the DB and
the full filename on the client.
Also note that user cannot change the
Hi Hugo,
Let me explain the scenario.
(A). First user attached a file name called test.txt which contains
characters Test. The second user overwrite this file into new
filename called test2.txt which containts Test2. No both file name
and number of characters are changed.
I wrote one filter
Meenakshinathan,
Just to verify ( Because Attachments in ARS are a special thing
when compared to the other ARS data types.)
There is an attachment Pool field named What on this form?
How many attachment fields are in this pool and what are their names?
Is it possible that your filter it
PROTECTED] (Wireless)
- Original Message -
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Thu Aug 02 07:57:19 2007
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
Hi Hugo,
Let me explain the scenario.
(A). First user attached
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hugo Visser
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:15 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
** You cannot compare the file contents, but using TR you should be able
to detect that a file was attached again (if the DB value wasn't
$NULL$). The value
, 2007 5:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
** You cannot compare the file contents, but using TR you should be able
to detect that a file was attached again (if the DB value wasn't
$NULL$). The value contains the file size in bytes, the compressed
size in the DB
AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Attachement Updation
Meenakshinathan,
Just to verify ( Because Attachments in ARS are a special thing when
compared to the other ARS data types.)
There is an attachment Pool field named What on this form?
How many attachment fields are in this pool
Also,
This will only work if the name of the file changes, I'm not looking to
see if the data inside of the attachment has changed...
Lisa
-Original Message-
From: Kemes, Lisa
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 4:01 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Attachement Updation
I had
Hi Listers,
In my application, at first stage users can attach 3-4 files. when the
request assinged to next stage, that next stage user can edit or
modify the attachment and can upload it again. In this stage my client
has an requirement like, first stage user to be notified whenever any
I'm not entirely sure on this, but couldn't you do a filter on modify
with a run-if condition as: 'TR.Attachment' != 'DB.Attachment' ?? I'm
not entirely sure how remedy stores the attachments. It might
work
Anyone else ??
On 7/27/07, Meenakshinathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Listers,
45 matches
Mail list logo
