RESOLVED: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT

lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott, Sean Sent: August 15, 2006 9:49 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT No problem, I did execute a few quick tests, for fields, forms and Active Links and it is working fine, but I will continue to examine the issue in more deta

Re: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT

merge those into the destination change history. Thanks, Sean -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:22 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT Thanks Scott.

Re: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT

ask option for Fields in addition > to Forms. > > Thanks, > Sean > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 4:30 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG >

Re: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT

est System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 4:30 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: OT: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT I downloaded Migrator 7 (patch 001) and the bug that existed in 6.00.01 (patch 1488) still exists. That defect is i

OT: Migrator 6 and 7 - DEFECT

I downloaded Migrator 7 (patch 001) and the bug that existed in 6.00.01 (patch 1488) still exists. That defect is it does not migrate the change history. I have reported this to Remedy and they have verified this - the defect reference number is: SW00249175. The previous defect reference for