Thanks Misi - performance is why I added it last time as well. It just
struck me as an important enough field that there should already be an
index on it, so I was questioning my understanding of it.
Thanks again,
Thad
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Misi Mladoniczky m...@rrr.se wrote:
Hi,
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: No index on the Name field of BMC.CORE:BMC_BaseElement (7.6.04)
**
Thanks Misi - performance is why I added it last time as well. It just struck
me as an important enough field that there should already be an index on it, so
I was questioning my understanding of it.
Thanks again
The Email message error form needed an index on message id.This was
missing OOB
On Monday, June 4, 2012 6:42:06 PM UTC-5, Thad Esser wrote:
**
Hello,
We are reviewing the customizations we did for CMDB 2.1 in preparation for
an upgrade to 7.6.04. Way back when, an index was added
Hi,
I added that index in my last 7.6.04 project, and it made a really big
difference in performance.
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money
Hello,
We are reviewing the customizations we did for CMDB 2.1 in preparation for
an upgrade to 7.6.04. Way back when, an index was added on the Name field
of BaseElement to improve CI search speeds for our customers. I remember
thinking at the time that it was odd that it wasn't already there
5 matches
Mail list logo
