Re: Question: Change 6.0 - Task Sequence

Of T. Dee Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:44 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: Change 6.0 - Task Sequence Error is set as the enforcement. Ty On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Tanner, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It also depends on how the Application is set t

Re: Question: Change 6.0 - Task Sequence

Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:26 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Question: Change 6.0 - Task Sequence > > Does anyone else use Change 6.0? If so does your system let someone > cl

Re: Question: Change 6.0 - Task Sequence

: Question: Change 6.0 - Task Sequence Does anyone else use Change 6.0? If so does your system let someone close a Task that has a sequence of lets say 3 when 0, 1, and 2 are still open? I thought you couldn't job to another Task and close it if previous ones were open? T

Question: Change 6.0 - Task Sequence

Does anyone else use Change 6.0? If so does your system let someone close a Task that has a sequence of lets say 3 when 0, 1, and 2 are still open? I thought you couldn't job to another Task and close it if previous ones were open? THANKS! ___

Question: Change 6.0

In Change 6.0 there is a field called 'zTmpReqNotAddress' - there is alot of workflow that uses this to Notify the users. But I can't find when / how or where this field gets set. Any ideas? Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or a