9 12:21 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: The values for this entry violate a unique index that has
> been defined for this form. : NTE:SYS-Group NT Control entry
>
> **
> Hello Kevin,
>
> Does NTE:SYS-NT Process Control have any old entries? I am tempted to
>
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:21 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: The values for this entry violate a unique index that has been
defined for this form. : NTE:SYS-Group NT Control entry
**
Hello Kevin,
Does NTE:SYS-NT Process Control have any old entries? I am tempted to remove
them
feedback.
frex
--- En date de : Lun 8.6.09, Begosh, Kevin a écrit :
De: Begosh, Kevin
Objet: Re: The values for this entry violate a unique index that has been
defined for this form. : NTE:SYS-Group NT Control entry
À: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Lundi 8 Juin 2009, 16h14
**
I am currently
Frex Popo
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 4:14 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: The values for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined
for this form. : NTE:SYS-Group NT Control entry
**
Dear all,
ARS. 7.1 patch 4 / OS. NT2003 SRV Edition / DB. MS SQL SRV 2005
It states
kevin.beg...@lmco.com
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Frex Popo
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 4:14 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: The values for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined
for this form. : NTE:SYS-Group
Dear all,
ARS. 7.1 patch 4 / OS. NT2003 SRV Edition / DB. MS SQL SRV 2005
It states in the performance and optimisation manual, only one node in a server
group should be used as the server for admin changes (i.e forms, workflow
etc..) but both should be accessed when making other changes (i.e
6 matches
Mail list logo
