Re: [Artifactory-users] Artifactory 2.1.3 standalone not working with oracle

2010-04-27 Thread Bruno Medeiros
*Preserving Build Information* *Please also note that using the upgrade process is the only way to move deployed build-information forward. You cannot import an export of 2.1.x with BuildInfo data into 2.2.x. This is a result of a bug that has already been resolved.* What does it exactly

Re: [Artifactory-users] Artifactory 2.1.3 standalone not working with oracle

2010-04-27 Thread Yoav Landman
Glad you managed, and yes - mysql/fs is a better option overall. The caveat about the build information old migration bug refers to migration of metadata about builds stored in Artifactory by our CI Build Integration ( http://wiki.jfrog.org/confluence/display/RTF/Build+Integration). Since Build

[Artifactory-users] Problem with maven-metada.xml after import a 2.0.1 full export on a 2.2.3 fresh install

2010-04-27 Thread Bruno Medeiros
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 17:33, Yoav Landman yo...@jfrog.org wrote: Glad you managed, and yes - mysql/fs is a better option overall. Hi again, Yoav. As I changed the subject, let me explain again what I'm doing here. I'm trying export the whole 2.0.1 system and import in a 2.2.3 fresh install.

Re: [Artifactory-users] Problem with maven-metada.xml after import a 2.0.1 full export on a 2.2.3 fresh install

2010-04-27 Thread Bruno Medeiros
Just adding some more info: I did a new export with artifactory especifc metadata, and then a import on the new server. This new import didn't show the No metadata files found warning. But when ask for the maven-metadata.xml, a wrong file is given (and different from the file that are supposed