, David R. (Fed)
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 9:24 AM
To: Tan, Ting Rei (IntlAssoc) ; Robert Jördens
Cc: artiq@lists.m-labs.hk
Subject: RE: [ARTIQ] ARTIQ hardware proposal
-Original Message-
From: ARTIQ [mailto:artiq-boun...@lists.m-labs.hk] On Behalf Of Tan, Ting Rei
(IntlAssoc)
Sent
-Original Message-
From: ARTIQ [mailto:artiq-boun...@lists.m-labs.hk] On Behalf Of Tan, Ting Rei
(IntlAssoc)
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 3:50 PM
To: Robert Jördens
Cc: artiq@lists.m-labs.hk
Subject: Re: [ARTIQ] ARTIQ hardware proposal
I agree that not stuffing ADC does not make
t: Friday, March 18, 2016 9:47 AM
To: artiq@lists.m-labs.hk
Subject: [ARTIQ] ARTIQ hardware proposal
Hi,
I've been collecting ideas about the new hardware we've been talking about for
a while. Please see the attached document and let me know what you think.
Sébastien
__
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Leibrandt, David R. (Fed)
wrote:
> Overall I think this looks pretty good. Here are a few comments:
> * I like the 2x AD9656 better than the 1x ADC16DX370 for the ADC on the DSP
> boards. I think the most common use case for these will be pulsed laser
> power s
hk
Subject: Re: [ARTIQ] ARTIQ hardware proposal
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Tan, Ting Rei (IntlAssoc)
wrote:
> For complicated trap users, the most common use case is to drive trap
> electrode so we will need much more DAC channels and ADC channels. One
> possible solution is to h
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Tan, Ting Rei (IntlAssoc)
wrote:
> For complicated trap users, the most common use case is to drive trap
> electrode so we will need much more DAC channels and ADC channels. One
> possible solution is to have two kind of DSP boards? One with balanced DAC
> and ADC
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
> What about grounding the FMC pins near the analog signals, would that help?
Yes. This is also what the USRP hardware does. And FMC does ground
shielding for its regular digital pairs as well. Given that nobody
seems to have done an
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Leibrandt, David R. (Fed)
mailto:david.leibra...@nist.gov>> wrote:
> Overall I think this looks pretty good. Here are a few comments:
> * I like the 2x AD9656 better than the 1x ADC16DX370 for the ADC on the DSP
> boards. I think the most common use case for t
On Friday, 18 March 2016 9:46:17 PM HKT Robert Jördens wrote:
> > * Is FMC good for high-speed analog signals?
>
> By itself yes. Extremely well matched high speed differential pairs.
> The only limit could be coupling into the analog signals from other
> circuitry. The data point I have for this
On Friday, 18 March 2016 4:27:53 PM HKT Ben Keitch wrote:
> This gives me a 404:
>
> http://ssl.serverraum.org/lists-archive/artiq/attachments/20160318/ce9d656c/
> attachment.pdf
This links works fine here. Anyway, here is the slightly updated version.
Change log: https://github.com/m-labs/artiq
Hi,
I've been collecting ideas about the new hardware we've been talking about for
a while. Please see the attached document and let me know what you think.
Sébastien
artiq_hardware.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
ARTIQ mailing list
https://s
11 matches
Mail list logo
