> Impressive. Yep. Looks doable then. For us it would probably be either just
> filtering and amplification on four channels, or upconversion (on two iq
> channels then i would think).
Agreed, seems doable. Filtering plus amplification should fit in a suitable
footprint pretty easily. Two chann
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Grzegorz Kasprowicz
wrote:
> Actually, we can fit a lot to single FMC
> Look here:
> https://scontent-waw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/66620_1649317561668_2595483_n.jpg?oh=982ee50c1a1d8ecc444346c9eae1fe1c&oe=578FA78C
> I managed to place there 16 AFEs, 16
the shielding/heat sink
http://www.ohwr.org/attachments/3303/250M_top.jpg
-Original Message-
From: ARTIQ [mailto:artiq-boun...@lists.m-labs.hk] On Behalf Of Robert Jördens
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 10:08 PM
To: artiq@lists.m-labs.hk
Subject: [ARTIQ] Fwd: FW: initial specification of
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Grzegorz Kasprowicz
wrote:
> Maybe we should come back to the roots:)
> What if we use standard FMCs (LPC) with DAC/ADC channels and RF stuff _on_
> them.
> JESD204B and some pins would go to the FPGA while DAC and RF clock would be
> fed externally.
> In this wa
