On Friday, October 20, 2017 12:36 AM, Slichter, Daniel H. (Fed) wrote:
Judging from the absence of replies to this email, we will not
support generators on the core device nor MultiScanManager.
My main question with this is about time efficiency -- if you were to
go to the effort to support
On 2017-10-19 16:36, Slichter, Daniel H. (Fed) via ARTIQ wrote:
Judging from the absence of replies to this email, we will not support
generators on the core device nor MultiScanManager.
My main question with this is about time efficiency -- if you were to
go to the effort to support this on
> Judging from the absence of replies to this email, we will not support
> generators on the core device nor MultiScanManager.
My main question with this is about time efficiency -- if you were to go to the
effort to support this on the core device, will it end up taking a lot longer
(i.e.
Hi,
Judging from the absence of replies to this email, we will not support
generators on the core device nor MultiScanManager.
Sébastien
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 02:34 PM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
Hi,
to implement scans on the core device
Hi,
to implement scans on the core device
(https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/issues/118) in the best way possible,
we need some information about how ARTIQ is used and will be used:
* are Python generators (i.e. using "yield") something that you know
about, use, and would like to see supported