Stefan,
Ok, then 'Mirrored Lorentz' is not a good replacement since it works
differently. This will also be difficult to consider in any new
implementation. I thought the policy was to leave such optimizations up to
the user...
The new system I suggest has to remove the lineshapes of today and
Dear Richard,
> Ps. The cutoff is determined based on the negative frequency and not on the
> frequency of the line. Not sure if that is intentional or not, since I still
> have not read the papers on why the cutoff exists. This is not a big
> numerical issue but at most a potential mismatch
Stefan,
Mirroring Voigt or HTP internally will not be an issue. This could happen
by a flag and either trigger parallel computations or companion functions.
(I prefer the latter because then you can set the flag to use Lorentz in
the mirroring if the effects are so far-wing that it should work th
