Hi,
So, in the specific issue raised by Jacob, I vote for simply going back to
> the old behaviour. It is formally correct to get a clear sky result in a
> calculation without cloud box,
rolled that back (for all doit, disort, and rt4 interfaces).
> so let’s trust the user that he knows what
Hi Jana and Jakob , hi all,
Before commenting on this particular questions, I see a more general
discussion here. There are many similar issues. Shall we focus on
catching potential user mistakes/misunderstandings, or be less
restrictive to simplify batch/operational processing? For example,
Hi,
recently there has been a change in the way DOIT and DISORT handle
atmospheres where the cloud box is switched off (cloudbox_on = 0). Before,
they just skipped the scattering calculation, threw a warning, and
everything was ok, as the clear-sky calculations afterwards took care of
it.
But
