”.
>
>
>
> *From:* Fox, Stuart
> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 09:26
> *To:* Richard Larsson
> *Cc:* arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
> *Subject:* RE: ARTS line absorption v2.3 vs v2.5
>
>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
>
>
> Thanks very much for your reply. I expect the dif
Sorry – for v2.5 I should have said I’m seeing differences between
mirroring_option=”SameAsLineShape” and mirroring_option=”Manual”.
From: Fox, Stuart
Sent: 10 June 2021 09:26
To: Richard Larsson
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: RE: ARTS line absorption v2.3 vs v2.5
Hi Richard
2021 17:01
To: Fox, Stuart
Cc: arts_dev.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: ARTS line absorption v2.3 vs v2.5
This email was received from an external source. Always check sender details,
links & attachments.
Hi Stuart,
All the differences between current 2.5 version and old version th
Hi Stuart,
All the differences between current 2.5 version and old version that I can
think of are:
The Doppler broadening is computed on shifted frequencies instead of on
unshifted frequencies. This should be more accurate as far as
I am concerned.
The normalization factor is computed on the
