Re: [arts-users] ARTS SSD

[Isaac Moradi]

Hi Vasileios,

Thank you for taking time to put this together. After playing with the code 
realized that it wouldn’t even read a single NetCDF file. The solution I found 
was to uninstall the NetCDF4 using conda (conda uninstall netcdf4) then install 
it using pip install netcdf4. Thankfully, this did not affect reading other 
habits.


Thanks for your help.


Best,
Isaac



> On May 17, 2021, at 5:51 AM, Vasileios Barlakas 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hello Issac,
> 
> Since you are able to load other habits, but for the LiquidSphere one, it 
> seems to me that this is a  "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" issue. This 
> habit is available in 200 sizes (most among the habits) and the python script 
> could potentially crash (depending on the machine used). Could you try 
> loading the data just for one size and temperature? Attached you can find an 
> example python script.
> 
> To ensure that there is no issue, I double checked loading the data (with the 
> attached script) in two machines and, I had not problem.
> 
> Best regards,
> Vasileios Barlakas
> 
> 

___
arts_users.mi mailing list
arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi

[arts-users] ARTS SSD

[Vasileios Barlakas]

Hello Issac,


Since you are able to load other habits, but for the LiquidSphere one, it seems 
to me that this is a  "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" issue. This habit is 
available in 200 sizes (most among the habits) and the python script could 
potentially crash (depending on the machine used). Could you try loading the 
data just for one size and temperature? Attached you can find an example python 
script.


To ensure that there is no issue, I double checked loading the data (with the 
attached script) in two machines and, I had not problem.

Best regards,
Vasileios Barlakas

<>
___
arts_users.mi mailing list
arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi

[arts-users] ARTS SSD

[Vasileios Barlakas]

Hello Issac,


Since you are able to load other habits, but for the LiquidSphere one, it seems 
to me that this is a  "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" issue. This habit is 
available in 200 sizes (most among the habits) and the python script could 
potentially crash (depending on the machine used). Could you try loading the 
data just for one size and temperature? Attached you can find an example python 
script.


To ensure that there is no issue, I double checked loading the data (with the 
attached script) in two machines and, I had not problem.

Best regards,
Vasileios Barlakas

<>
___
arts_users.mi mailing list
arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi

[arts-users] ARTS SSD

[Isaac Moradi]

Hello all,

I am trying to read the ARTS SSD database for ‘LiquidSphere’ in Python and no 
matter what module I use (Scipy, Netcdf4, etc), the code crashes with no error 
message. I can read the netcdf files using ncdump or nco, though. I can also 
read all the other habits using the Python interface with no issues.

Is there anything specific with these files that Python cannot read them? I am 
using the toolkit provided with the database and the function 
utils.ssdb_import_habit(habID,orient) to read the SSD data.


Thanks


Best,
Isaac Moradi

NASA GMAO Code 610.1
ESSIC, University of Maryland
isaac.mor...@nasa.gov ___
arts_users.mi mailing list
arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi

Re: [arts-users] ARTS SSD update 1.1.0

[Patrick Eriksson]

Robert,

No, the update did not include the azimuthally random oriented (ARO) ice 
particle.


For ice habits, the update covered only totally random orientation. But 
also introduced ARO data for non-spherical rain drops.


Bye,

Patrick



On 2021-04-08 22:45, Schrom, Robert S. (GSFC-612.0)[UNIVERSITIES SPACE 
RESEARCH ASSOCIATION] wrote:

Hello,

I saw the latest update on the ARTS scattering database for version 
1.1.0, and that the DDA calculations at low frequencies used a higher 
eps value. I was wondering if these updated calculations also include 
the azimuthally random oriented ice particles or if only the totally 
random ice particle calculations have been updated. The online archive 
for the oriented particle calculations 
(https://zenodo.org/record/3727673#.YG9omi2cai4) suggests that the 
latest update was in 2019.


Thank you,

Robert Schrom


___
arts_users.mi mailing list
arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi


___
arts_users.mi mailing list
arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi

[arts-users] ARTS SSD update 1.1.0

[Schrom, Robert S. (GSFC-612.0)[UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION]]

Hello,

I saw the latest update on the ARTS scattering database for version 1.1.0, and 
that the DDA calculations at low frequencies used a higher eps value. I was 
wondering if these updated calculations also include the azimuthally random 
oriented ice particles or if only the totally random ice particle calculations 
have been updated. The online archive for the oriented particle calculations 
(https://zenodo.org/record/3727673#.YG9omi2cai4) suggests that the latest 
update was in 2019.

Thank you,

Robert Schrom
___
arts_users.mi mailing list
arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de
https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi