Re: [asdf-devel] 1.675 bug

2010-04-15 Thread szergling
On 4/15/10, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote: Ahem. Does it work better with 1.679? It's hard to test these things without access to a Windows machine... Also, I realize that in Unix, I rely on absolute-pathname-p meaning a completely qualified pathname, which breaks down on Windows, with

Re: [asdf-devel] Hoist by my own petard: problem with asdf-binary-locations compatibility.

2010-04-15 Thread james anderson
good evening; On 2010-04-15, at 03:04 , Robert Goldman wrote: One of my own systems got blown up by ASDF-OUTPUT-TRANSLATIONS recently, and the case may be an interesting one: [ ... ] We have a pont-file which ISA cl-source-file. But there is no .lisp file to begin with. Instead, we have

[asdf-devel] :in-order-to

2010-04-15 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
Who uses it? Out of 291 packages, the only uses seem to be - Defining TEST-OP operations (greate majority) - In a few tests, it solves a wrong ordering of files - In two, it deactivates operations by using FEATURE (obscure way to do it) The paradigmatic example of McClim cited here

Re: [asdf-devel] :in-order-to

2010-04-15 Thread james anderson
On 2010-04-15, at 22:26 , Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: Who uses it? depends on what one means by uses it? the value in the respective slot is more-or-less central to the dependency computation and is initialized in the instantiation process[1]. once it plays that role, is there any

Re: [asdf-devel] (Somewhat urgent) ASDF manual link broken

2010-04-15 Thread Faré
On 15 April 2010 08:48, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote: Just a warning: Setting up a webpage with a redirect message is not advised by Google. If you do so instead of setting a redirection via .htaccess, or a permanent link, then this will be regarded as

Re: [asdf-devel] (Somewhat urgent) ASDF manual link broken

2010-04-15 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
Great! Thanks a lot. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 April 2010 08:48, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote: Just a warning: Setting up a webpage with a redirect message is not advised by Google. If you do so instead

[asdf-devel] Added a new test

2010-04-15 Thread Robert Goldman
I originally thought that ASDF might not notice if a source file was lost, as long as a fasl was left around. In fact, it /does/ notice, which is what I had hoped. I just added a test to verify this, just in case. Please try and run this when you get a chance, just to make sure it's truly

[asdf-devel] ASDF 1.700

2010-04-15 Thread Faré
I did a big rewrite of TRAVERSE and a bunch of other fixes. Can you try out ASDF 1.700 ? Note that this breaks POIU. I don't understand what POIU does to TRAVERSE and PARSE-COMPONENT-FORM. I will have to fix it since the reason why I'm interested in fixing TRAVERSE is to be able to use POIU to

Re: [asdf-devel] ASDF 1.700

2010-04-15 Thread Faré
1.700 was badly broken. 1.702 fixes it, hopefully. Works for me. [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | ReflectionCybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. — Ernst Haeckel On 15 April 2010 19:42, james anderson james.ander...@setf.de wrote: On 2010-04-16, at