Re: [asdf-devel] prepare-op

2012-12-17 Thread Zach Beane
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: OK, this is now committed as of ASDF 2.26.21 and POIU 1.29.3. It's slightly smaller, it's much cleaner, and it all works. I hope I have not broken users — please test. Casualties of the cleanup were :feature and :if-component-dep-fails. They were just horrible

Re: [asdf-devel] prepare-op

2012-12-17 Thread Faré
Casualties of the cleanup were :feature and :if-component-dep-fails. They were just horrible things. FYI, the sb-rotate-byte contrib in SBCL uses :if-component-dep-fails. I've contacted the SBCL maintainers. Hopefully they will revert to #+x86-64 and such until a new asdf is universal. But

Re: [asdf-devel] prepare-op

2012-12-17 Thread Stas Boukarev
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: Casualties of the cleanup were :feature and :if-component-dep-fails. They were just horrible things. FYI, the sb-rotate-byte contrib in SBCL uses :if-component-dep-fails. I've contacted the SBCL maintainers. Hopefully they will revert to #+x86-64 and such

Re: [asdf-devel] prepare-op

2012-12-17 Thread Christophe Rhodes
Zach Beane x...@xach.com writes: Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: OK, this is now committed as of ASDF 2.26.21 and POIU 1.29.3. It's slightly smaller, it's much cleaner, and it all works. I hope I have not broken users — please test. Casualties of the cleanup were :feature and

Re: [asdf-devel] prepare-op

2012-12-17 Thread Faré
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Christophe Rhodes cs...@cantab.net wrote: Zach Beane x...@xach.com writes: Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: OK, this is now committed as of ASDF 2.26.21 and POIU 1.29.3. It's slightly smaller, it's much cleaner, and it all works. I hope I have not broken users