Recent experience shows that changes leading to ASDF 3 have changed the
way one must specify new operation classes, in a way that is not
backward-compatible. Thanks to Faré for helping me diagnose problems in
one such system.
I will be looking into this, and hope to add at least one new test to
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Recent experience shows that changes leading to ASDF 3 have changed the
way one must specify new operation classes, in a way that is not
backward-compatible. Thanks to Faré for helping me diagnose problems in
one
Hi Robert,
I have a couple of libraries that make their own operation and component
classes, asdf-dso, asdf-objects and smarkup come to mind. See
https://github.com/slyrus/asdf-objects and https://github.com/slyrus/smarkup.
Cyrus
On Jan 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Robert P. Goldman
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Cyrus Harmon ch-l...@bobobeach.com wrote:
I have a couple of libraries that make their own operation and component
classes, asdf-dso, asdf-objects and smarkup come to mind. See
https://github.com/slyrus/asdf-objects and
https://github.com/slyrus/smarkup.
These
CCL: package-system-test.script
clisp: asdf-pathname-test.script package-system-test.script
test-sysdef-asdf.script
sbcl: package-system-test
ecl: package-system-test.script test-bundle.script (expected)
test-sysdef-asdf.script
cmucl: package-system-test
lispworks: package-system-test
I'm
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
CCL: package-system-test.script
clisp: asdf-pathname-test.script package-system-test.script
test-sysdef-asdf.script
sbcl: package-system-test
ecl: package-system-test.script test-bundle.script (expected)
Faré wrote:
Do you have a backtrace for asdf-pathname-test on CCL and/or SBCL?
This one only failed for me on clisp. Here's the error:
TEST ABORTED: These two expressions yield paths that are not pathname-equal
the first expression (MAKE-PATHNAME :HOST ASDFTEST :DIRECTORY
'(:ABSOLUTE system2
Faré wrote:
I added some code in test-sysdef-asdf that invokes run-program with
:directory to check that the Makefile and asdf.asd are in sync with
respect to the ordered list of files in asdf (and same in uiop).
Thanks, I confirm that your patch fixes this test on CCL and SBCL.
Best,
r
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
TEST ABORTED: These two expressions yield paths that are not pathname-equal
the first expression (MAKE-PATHNAME :HOST ASDFTEST :DIRECTORY
'(:ABSOLUTE system2 module4) :NAME NIL :TYPE NIL) yields this:
