On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
> Per the principle of failing obviously, I propose to raise an error upon
> attempts to use bundle-op with ECL or ABCL on Mac OSX. The bundle-op
> tests have been failing for me on those platforms for as long as I can
> remember.
>
> For
> I get this, and the recoding is a HUGE improvement. Furthermore, you
> have convinced me that we can't unwind this change in any way that won't
> create yet more damage.
>
> However:
> a. This change is not backward-compatible
>
Actually, I looked again, and paren-compile-op is actually unaffec
Per the principle of failing obviously, I propose to raise an error upon
attempts to use bundle-op with ECL or ABCL on Mac OSX. The bundle-op
tests have been failing for me on those platforms for as long as I can
remember.
For ECL, at least, I believe this to be an implementation bug, having to
d
Faré wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Robert P. Goldman
> wrote:
>> While there are bug fixes waiting to reach our users, I'm quite
>> concerned by the loss of backwards compatibility in systems that defined
>> their own OPERATION subclasses.
>>
> This backward incompatibility already ha
I'm definitely in.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 3, 2014, at 1:10, Faré wrote:
>
> Dear Lisp hackers,
>
> I'm considering recording a walk through the ASDF sources.
>
> I'd like to have an interactive session over Google Hangout
> with one or a few people, explaining the current code in asdf/def
Excellent idea! Please let me know when you will be doing this. Currently, I
would possibly profit from an explanation of the kinds of "transversal" ASDF
does over the "system of systems" it needs to do, but that is not too sharply
defined as a question yet.
Tersely pecked on my Nexus 5
On Ja
