Faré wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info
wrote:
I have tried to pull all the dependencies for ASDF building into the
repo. I have done this primarily using git submodules, but also had to
pull in cl-ppcre as source, since it doesn't seem to be
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Thanks. Please pull an update, and have a look. I replaced the local
copy with a git submodule.
Looks like it works for me.
You should update the README with instructions on how to use this feature,
i.e. do git
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Quick PS: what mechanism do you think should be used to tweak this
setting? Should presumably be something easy to specify (i.e., not a
config file), so that one can quickly start a lisp script, without
messing up
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Once again, where under a hierarchy the .asd files are is ultimately
the knowledge and responsibility of the curators of the respective
source trees, not of the end-user. Therefore, the absence of recursion
should
Faré wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info
wrote:
[...snip...]
I changed by ASDF_DEVEL_SOURCE_REGISTRY to point to the local
submodules, and this seems to work adequately, but I don't have great tests.
Actually, the asdf initialization routine could
Has there been any more progress on this front, since 11 August? That
was the last email I saw on the subject.
Best,
r
___
Asdf-devel mailing list
Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
Actually, the asdf initialization routine could unconditionally
add the asdf tree to the path: either it's present or not, but it
doesn't hurt to try,
and so no need to export ASDF_DEVEL_SOURCE_REGISTRY, then.
I'm not entirely sure about this. Here's my question: if someone is
developing
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Has there been any more progress on this front, since 11 August? That
was the last email I saw on the subject.
Dave and I had a brief conversation about it at ILC 2014. My advice
was to modify test-bundle.script and
