Hi,
On 2015-09-16 20:06 CEST, Faré wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>> [...]
>> I regret the inclusion of the bundle operations [...]
> You're underestimating what the bundle operations brought to ASDF 3,
> even on
>> * image-op and program-op couldn't have been fully portable without
>> bundle-operations, and wouldn't have been attempted.
>
> I use program-op on a regular basis and it has replaced a very complex
> scripting machinery which I gladly got rid of.
+1
it eliminated an entire project for us
It's possible, and some people have done it for SBCL at Google using
bazel.io, though they never spent the time making it open source. I
could extract bits from it and reproduce the same thing with ASDF, but
I'd rather someone else do it, though I can explain what I see in
those files.
Or then
> is any of you interested in automating application delivery using ASDF?
> Now that I fixed ASDF's bundle operations and CFFI, the missing piece
> is the part where
> the bundled object files are linked against the runtime to produce a
> self-contained executable.
that^ sounds as if it was
Hi, I am exploring the possibility of using ASDF to define systems of
non-Lisp code, specifically for Maxima (http://maxima.sourceforge.net).
Maxima is written in Lisp but has its own language. I'd like to
be able to load programs written in Maxima's language and/or
Lisp.
It seems like ASDF
Take a look at
https://github.com/brown/protobuf/blob/master/protobuf.asd
and the other ".asd" files in that project.
The file above modifies ASDF so that it can compile and load
Google's protocol buffer definition files. It may be more
complicated than you need because ".proto" files are
> It's possible, and some people have done it for SBCL at Google using
> bazel.io, though they never spent the time making it open source. I
> could extract bits from it and reproduce the same thing with ASDF, but
> I'd rather someone else do it, though I can explain what I see in
> those files.
On 9/17/15 Sep 17 -12:57 PM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> Hi, I am exploring the possibility of using ASDF to define systems of
> non-Lisp code, specifically for Maxima (http://maxima.sourceforge.net).
> Maxima is written in Lisp but has its own language. I'd like to
> be able to load programs written
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Attila Lendvai wrote:
>> It's possible, and some people have done it for SBCL at Google using
>> bazel.io, though they never spent the time making it open source. I
>> could extract bits from it and reproduce the same thing with ASDF, but
>>
This section of the manual, and the surrounding chapter, may help:
https://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/asdf/Creating-new-operations.html#Creating-new-operations
You basically need to define a new component :maxima-file, :maxima, or
whatever the name.
If it produces a Lisp file that then gets
10 matches
Mail list logo