> :Robert
> Am I correct in thinking that Dave's way of building monolithic bundles of
> either fasls or source code are, at least potentially, a baby version of
> cross-compilation? It seems like these are interesting specifically because
> they could be loaded into different images (otherwise,
On 16 Jan 2018, at 10:46, Sam Steingold wrote:
Hi,
When I start CLISP with the full linking set (i.e., including all
possible extensions), I have 63 packages in (list-all-packages), and
37
of them (more than half!) comes from asdf (22 ASDF/* and 15 UIOP/*).
I wonder if I am the only one
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 17:46, Sam Steingold wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I start CLISP with the full linking set (i.e., including all
> possible extensions), I have 63 packages in (list-all-packages), and 37
> of them (more than half!) comes from asdf (22 ASDF/* and 15 UIOP/*).
>
> I
Hi,
When I start CLISP with the full linking set (i.e., including all
possible extensions), I have 63 packages in (list-all-packages), and 37
of them (more than half!) comes from asdf (22 ASDF/* and 15 UIOP/*).
I wonder if I am the only one unhappy about this.
In particular, has it ever been