On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
> The documentation of LOAD-SOURCE-OP seems contradictory.
>
> At first it says that loading source only (and never compiling) is "not
> workable."
>
> But later it describes LOAD-SOURCE-OP as doing just exactly the thing
> that we say is u
The documentation of LOAD-SOURCE-OP seems contradictory.
At first it says that loading source only (and never compiling) is "not
workable."
But later it describes LOAD-SOURCE-OP as doing just exactly the thing
that we say is unworkable.
If that is not what LOAD-SOURCE-OP does, what *does* it do?
Oops. I broke stuff in 2.014.13. Martin Simmons found the bug, I fixed
it, but too late for 2.015.
I committed 2.015.1, with a regression test. Apparently we weren't
testing that functionality before.
Is it OK to have load-source-op be broken for that while?
If not, should I release 2.016 now, or
