On 2010-02-24, at 16:42 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> [...]
the documentation generation code - as i've read and written it,
crawls packages and/or live images, so there's a lot it can do
without the markup hints. given that information, it is possible to
recognize almost eve
On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -9:35 AM, james anderson wrote:
>
> On 2010-02-24, at 16:19 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -9:09 AM, james anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> i wondered that. looks like markdown link-w/o-the-reference-id
>>> syntax. (is supported by docudown?)
>>> but then, it's not clear
On 2010-02-24, at 16:19 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -9:09 AM, james anderson wrote:
>>
>> i wondered that. looks like markdown link-w/o-the-reference-id
>> syntax. (is supported by docudown?)
>> but then, it's not clear were it finds it's definition. (work-in-
>> progress?)
>>
>>
On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -9:22 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
> Robert Goldman
> writes:
>
> Actually, &allow-other-keys would not be necessary if these weren't
> normal functions but generic functions. Then methods can add valid
> keywords. And there's a programmatic protocol to get at all valid
> ke
Robert Goldman
writes:
> On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -9:00 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
>> Robert Goldman writes:
>>
>>> On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -5:54 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
Although the way to extend operations by additional initargs is somewhat
cumbersome, it's possible. Unfortunate
On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -9:09 AM, james anderson wrote:
>
> i wondered that. looks like markdown link-w/o-the-reference-id
> syntax. (is supported by docudown?)
> but then, it's not clear were it finds it's definition. (work-in-
> progress?)
>
> which brings up larger questions.
> as i was writing d
On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -9:00 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
> Robert Goldman writes:
>
>> On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -5:54 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
>>>
>>> Although the way to extend operations by additional initargs is somewhat
>>> cumbersome, it's possible. Unfortunately, the sugar forms LOAD-SYSTEM,
i wondered that. looks like markdown link-w/o-the-reference-id
syntax. (is supported by docudown?)
but then, it's not clear were it finds it's definition. (work-in-
progress?)
which brings up larger questions.
as i was writing docstrings for de.setf.amqp, i wondered, while
markdown is most d
Robert Goldman writes:
> On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -5:54 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
>>
>> Although the way to extend operations by additional initargs is somewhat
>> cumbersome, it's possible. Unfortunately, the sugar forms LOAD-SYSTEM,
>> COMPILE-SYSTEM, and TEST-SYSTEM do not take additional inita
On 2/24/10 Feb 24 -5:54 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
>
> Although the way to extend operations by additional initargs is somewhat
> cumbersome, it's possible. Unfortunately, the sugar forms LOAD-SYSTEM,
> COMPILE-SYSTEM, and TEST-SYSTEM do not take additional initargs.
I see that the docstring
Although the way to extend operations by additional initargs is somewhat
cumbersome, it's possible. Unfortunately, the sugar forms LOAD-SYSTEM,
COMPILE-SYSTEM, and TEST-SYSTEM do not take additional initargs.
-T.
diff --git a/asdf.lisp b/asdf.lisp
index 92e7f6e..3f230d5 100644
--- a/asdf.lisp
11 matches
Mail list logo
