On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 23:11 -0500, Faré wrote:
Because the package was delete-package'd in an unwind-protect form
after loading the .asd file, and its symbols are thereafter
uninterned.
Then keep it, store it somewhere and perhaps delete it only when no
longer referenced.
I have no
On 1/26/13 Jan 26 -6:12 PM, Faré wrote:
I think the whole temporary package thing is a failure, and we
should just have
an ASDF-USER package that uses ASDF.
Does anyone have any objection to having .asd files be loaded in
a shared ASDF-USER rather than a temporary ASDF~D package?
If you
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
On 1/26/13 Jan 26 -6:12 PM, Faré wrote:
I think the whole temporary package thing is a failure, and we
should just have
an ASDF-USER package that uses ASDF.
Does anyone have any objection to having .asd files be
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 19:12 -0500, Faré wrote:
I think the whole temporary package thing is a failure, and we
What problems does it actually cause ?
--
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Stelian Ionescu sione...@cddr.org wrote:
I think the whole temporary package thing is a failure, and we
What problems does it actually cause ?
It causes having to maintain this weird system,
having functions and classes the symbols of which become
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 20:48 -0500, Faré wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Stelian Ionescu sione...@cddr.org wrote:
I think the whole temporary package thing is a failure, and we
What problems does it actually cause ?
It causes having to maintain this weird system,
having
Because the package was delete-package'd in an unwind-protect form
after loading the .asd file, and its symbols are thereafter
uninterned.
Then keep it, store it somewhere and perhaps delete it only when no
longer referenced.
I have no way to know when the package is not referenced.
ASDF
