30.03.2014, 05:29, "Daniel Herring" :
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
>
>> 29.03.2014, 02:39, "Daniel Herring" :
>>> Would it be possible to have a special header in asdf files indicate that
>>> the contained system(s) should be loaded using the new syntax mechanism?
>>>
>>> [...]
> I haven't checked recently, but in the past ASDF files have had significant
> code even before the system definition. It was common to find conditionals
> based on *features*, comments for users to select from a few customization
> options, numbers being read, etc.
>
> Once you have read the for
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
29.03.2014, 02:39, "Daniel Herring" :
Would it be possible to have a special header in asdf files indicate that
the contained system(s) should be loaded using the new syntax mechanism?
[...]
;; asdf:config '(asdf:+clean-readtable+)
No, it's incon
16.03.2014, 19:20, "Robert P. Goldman" wrote about
readtable hygiene:
> 2. The proposed change should be modified to operate only in a "strict
> mode", allowing existing legal CL code to continue to work. I propose
> that individual systems be allowed to proclaim that they should be
> operated o
