Re: [asdf-devel] Q about ASDF on LW

2010-03-11 Thread Robert Goldman
On 1/20/10 Jan 20 -1:59 PM, Nick Levine wrote: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Far=E9?= fah...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:30:48 -0500 Cc: Nick Levine n...@ravenbrook.com, asdf-devel@common-lisp.net If you actually send the backtrace on the list, or attach it to an ASDF bug on

Re: [asdf-devel] Q about ASDF on LW

2010-01-20 Thread Faré
2010/1/20 Nick Levine n...@ravenbrook.com:   Your backtrace shows nothing obviously wrong, and if extending the   stack does the trick, the problem is possibly that LW starts with   an extremely small stack and/or does some stack-allocation   optimizations that blow the little stack it has. I

Re: [asdf-devel] Q about ASDF on LW

2010-01-20 Thread Daniel Herring
Hi Nick, Note that this release of asdf has asdf-binary-locations built in. Thus it does not need to be loaded separately (input 4 below). Instead, load ASDF then (setf asdf:*enable-asdf-binary-locations* t). If you clear the asdf fasl and restart LW, does that work without blowing the