Re: [asdf-devel] Re: Another grammar question

2014-02-24 Thread Faré
> So I believe what happens is that use of :REQUIRE triggers the automatic > generation of a REQUIRE-SYSTEM for the corresponding module, and then its > loading, when necessary, is handled by REQUIRE. Yes? > Well, :REQUIRE triggers the generation of a REQUIRE-SYSTEM only if the implementation doe

Re: [asdf-devel] Re: Another grammar question

2014-02-24 Thread Robert Goldman
Faré wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: >> Faré wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: The :REQUIRE directive seems undocumented. Under what circumstances is it acceptable? >>> If I remember the intent and interpret the

[asdf-devel] Re: Another grammar question

2014-02-24 Thread Faré
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > Faré wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: >>> The :REQUIRE directive seems undocumented. >>> >>> Under what circumstances is it acceptable? >>> >> If I remember the intent and interpret the source code correctl

[asdf-devel] Re: Another grammar question

2014-02-23 Thread Faré
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > The :REQUIRE directive seems undocumented. > > Under what circumstances is it acceptable? > If I remember the intent and interpret the source code correctly, it is always acceptable, but highly non-portable, and is thus better guarded by a

[asdf-devel] Re: Another grammar question

2014-02-23 Thread Robert Goldman
Faré wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: >> The :REQUIRE directive seems undocumented. >> >> Under what circumstances is it acceptable? >> > If I remember the intent and interpret the source code correctly, > it is always acceptable, but highly non-portable, and is thu