On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-31.html
>
> - check out the cambl-test failures in the reports above,
> it signals some strange errors that cambl-test.sbcl-warnings is closed,
> cambl-test.cmucl-warnings is cl
13.02.2014, 01:09, "Faré" :
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
>
>> But let me first understand what is this "no applicable method
>> ASDF/COMPONENT:COMPONENT-CHILDREN"
>> error and why it wasn't detected previously.
>
> It's a bug I introduced in 3.1.0.56 with the backwa
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
> But let me first understand what is this "no applicable method
> ASDF/COMPONENT:COMPONENT-CHILDREN"
> error and why it wasn't detected previously.
>
It's a bug I introduced in 3.1.0.56 with the backward-compatible
propagation of unqualifie
Faré wrote:
> I believe the issue is that our "negative inheritance" trick causes us
> to attempt a downward-operation on components that don't have
> children.
>
> How do regular downward-operations manage to stop? Answer: by being
> specialized on parent-component.
In the past, we achieved this
I believe the issue is that our "negative inheritance" trick causes us
to attempt a downward-operation on components that don't have
children.
How do regular downward-operations manage to stop? Answer: by being
specialized on parent-component.
Our "negative-inheritance" method should thus either b
I have ACL Express on Windows. It limits heap size which fails some systems
compilation,
but anyway, may show some useful results. Or we can ask Dave's help.
But let me first understand what is this "no applicable method
ASDF/COMPONENT:COMPONENT-CHILDREN"
error and why it wasn't detected previou
Do you have the ability to run these checks with ACL? That was problematic in
this case, IIRC.
Thanks!
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 7:07, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
>
> 12.02.2014, 16:55, "Anton Vodonosov" :
>>
>> I now have results for SBCL and CCL with
>> (uiop:enable-deferred-warni
12.02.2014, 16:55, "Anton Vodonosov" :
>
> I now have results for SBCL and CCL with
> (uiop:enable-deferred-warnings-check):
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-31.html
In this report I found some failures which seem to be unrelated on warnings:
There is no applicable
12.02.2014, 09:24, "Faré" :
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Anton Vodonosov
> wrote:
>
>> Next I will try the deferred-warnings
>> enabled and :uiop in the use-list of :asdf-user.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> I assume you're doing these tests separately:
Yes, separately.
I now have results for S
