> On the other hand, it would be nice if ASDF would include the
> build.xcvb and the module form. If you have an objection to either,
> I'm curious what it is and I'll find another solution.
>
I agree. I'll apply your patch and push soon.
--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 559 8738
F
2009/7/9 Gary King :
>> If something along the lines is put it, I would suggest that TRT is to
>> signal an error and offer restarts to either delete the package or
>> continue blindly.
>
> I agree and it seems that a named restart would allow XCVB function
> correctly, right?
>
No it wouldn't, and
> If something along the lines is put it, I would suggest that TRT is to
> signal an error and offer restarts to either delete the package or
> continue blindly.
>
I agree and it seems that a named restart would allow XCVB function
correctly, right?
--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413
2009/7/9 Faré :
> Apparently, it is incorrect to try to update ASDF from a system where
> an older version of ASDF has already been loaded from which some
> DEFUNs (e.g. SYSTEM-SOURCE-FILE) have since converted to DEFGENERICs.
> This means that if you have an old clisp from debian and try to use
>
