Re: [asdf-devel] default source registry...

2010-02-22 Thread Samium Gromoff
From: Faré > Should we base our search path on the XDG Base Directory Specification? > http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html > To the point of actually using getenv to get these search paths? > > I say we should. > > The default configuration files should be > $

Re: [asdf-devel] default source registry...

2010-02-22 Thread Faré
Yes, ASDF will still work, in a backward-compatible way, if you only use the *central-registry*. This is actively supported. I'd like to eventually promote (asdf:initialize-source-registry ...) as an alternative to setf'ing *central-registry* when configuring from Lisp, and eventually declare the

Re: [asdf-devel] default source registry...

2010-02-22 Thread Robert Goldman
On 2/22/10 Feb 22 -11:23 AM, Faré wrote: > Should we base our search path on the XDG Base Directory Specification? > http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html > To the point of actually using getenv to get these search paths? > > I say we should. Only to the extent t

Re: [asdf-devel] default source registry...

2010-02-22 Thread dherring
> Should we base our search path on the XDG Base Directory Specification? > http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html > To the point of actually using getenv to get these search paths? > > I say we should. > > The default configuration files should be > $XDG_CONFIG_DIR