From: Faré
> Should we base our search path on the XDG Base Directory Specification?
> http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
> To the point of actually using getenv to get these search paths?
>
> I say we should.
>
> The default configuration files should be
> $
Yes, ASDF will still work, in a backward-compatible way, if you only
use the *central-registry*. This is actively supported.
I'd like to eventually promote (asdf:initialize-source-registry ...)
as an alternative to setf'ing *central-registry* when configuring from
Lisp, and eventually declare the
On 2/22/10 Feb 22 -11:23 AM, Faré wrote:
> Should we base our search path on the XDG Base Directory Specification?
> http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
> To the point of actually using getenv to get these search paths?
>
> I say we should.
Only to the extent t
> Should we base our search path on the XDG Base Directory Specification?
> http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
> To the point of actually using getenv to get these search paths?
>
> I say we should.
>
> The default configuration files should be
> $XDG_CONFIG_DIR